Analysis and contextual insights are available on OpenCVE Cloud.
No vendor fix or workaround currently provided.
Additional remediation guidance may be available on OpenCVE Cloud.
Tracking
Sign in to view the affected projects.
No advisories yet.
Mon, 09 Nov 2026 12:15:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| First Time appeared |
Apache
Apache airflow |
|
| Vendors & Products |
Apache
Apache airflow |
Mon, 09 Nov 2026 11:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| References |
|
Mon, 09 Nov 2026 09:30:00 +0000
| Type | Values Removed | Values Added |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Apache Airflow's secrets masker matched sensitive key names only in their snake_case form, so values stored under camelCase keys such as `privateKey`, `connectionString`, `webhookUrl` or `accessKey` — for example in a Connection's extra or a Variable — were not redacted in task logs, rendered template fields or API responses. A user who can read task logs or rendered templates, but is not meant to see those credentials, could read them in cleartext. Users are advised to upgrade to apache-airflow 3.4.0 or later. | |
| Title | Apache Airflow: Secrets masker: camelCase key names (privateKey, connectionString, webhookUrl) not matched against the sensitive-field list | |
| Weaknesses | CWE-522 | |
| References |
|
Status: PUBLISHED
Assigner: apache
Published:
Updated: 2026-11-09T10:09:36.852Z
Reserved: 2026-10-16T04:01:34.801Z
Link: CVE-2026-111452
No data.
Status : Received
Published: 2026-11-09T10:17:03.947
Modified: 2026-11-09T11:17:20.420
Link: CVE-2026-111452
No data.
OpenCVE Enrichment
Updated: 2026-11-09T12:00:14Z