Export limit exceeded: 14860 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (14860 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-46792 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-04 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: misaligned: Restrict user access to kernel memory raw_copy_{to,from}_user() do not call access_ok(), so this code allowed userspace to access any virtual memory address. | ||||
| CVE-2024-46695 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 3 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-08-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: selinux,smack: don't bypass permissions check in inode_setsecctx hook Marek Gresko reports that the root user on an NFS client is able to change the security labels on files on an NFS filesystem that is exported with root squashing enabled. The end of the kerneldoc comment for __vfs_setxattr_noperm() states: * This function requires the caller to lock the inode's i_mutex before it * is executed. It also assumes that the caller will make the appropriate * permission checks. nfsd_setattr() does do permissions checking via fh_verify() and nfsd_permission(), but those don't do all the same permissions checks that are done by security_inode_setxattr() and its related LSM hooks do. Since nfsd_setattr() is the only consumer of security_inode_setsecctx(), simplest solution appears to be to replace the call to __vfs_setxattr_noperm() with a call to __vfs_setxattr_locked(). This fixes the above issue and has the added benefit of causing nfsd to recall conflicting delegations on a file when a client tries to change its security label. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43880 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 3 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2026-08-04 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mlxsw: spectrum_acl_erp: Fix object nesting warning ACLs in Spectrum-2 and newer ASICs can reside in the algorithmic TCAM (A-TCAM) or in the ordinary circuit TCAM (C-TCAM). The former can contain more ACLs (i.e., tc filters), but the number of masks in each region (i.e., tc chain) is limited. In order to mitigate the effects of the above limitation, the device allows filters to share a single mask if their masks only differ in up to 8 consecutive bits. For example, dst_ip/25 can be represented using dst_ip/24 with a delta of 1 bit. The C-TCAM does not have a limit on the number of masks being used (and therefore does not support mask aggregation), but can contain a limited number of filters. The driver uses the "objagg" library to perform the mask aggregation by passing it objects that consist of the filter's mask and whether the filter is to be inserted into the A-TCAM or the C-TCAM since filters in different TCAMs cannot share a mask. The set of created objects is dependent on the insertion order of the filters and is not necessarily optimal. Therefore, the driver will periodically ask the library to compute a more optimal set ("hints") by looking at all the existing objects. When the library asks the driver whether two objects can be aggregated the driver only compares the provided masks and ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This is the right thing to do since the goal is to move as many filters as possible to the A-TCAM. The driver also forbids two identical masks from being aggregated since this can only happen if one was intentionally put in the C-TCAM to avoid a conflict in the A-TCAM. The above can result in the following set of hints: H1: {mask X, A-TCAM} -> H2: {mask Y, A-TCAM} // X is Y + delta H3: {mask Y, C-TCAM} -> H4: {mask Z, A-TCAM} // Y is Z + delta After getting the hints from the library the driver will start migrating filters from one region to another while consulting the computed hints and instructing the device to perform a lookup in both regions during the transition. Assuming a filter with mask X is being migrated into the A-TCAM in the new region, the hints lookup will return H1. Since H2 is the parent of H1, the library will try to find the object associated with it and create it if necessary in which case another hints lookup (recursive) will be performed. This hints lookup for {mask Y, A-TCAM} will either return H2 or H3 since the driver passes the library an object comparison function that ignores the A-TCAM / C-TCAM indication. This can eventually lead to nested objects which are not supported by the library [1]. Fix by removing the object comparison function from both the driver and the library as the driver was the only user. That way the lookup will only return exact matches. I do not have a reliable reproducer that can reproduce the issue in a timely manner, but before the fix the issue would reproduce in several minutes and with the fix it does not reproduce in over an hour. Note that the current usefulness of the hints is limited because they include the C-TCAM indication and represent aggregation that cannot actually happen. This will be addressed in net-next. [1] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 153 at lib/objagg.c:170 objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 153 Comm: kworker/0:18 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-custom-g70fbc2c1c38b #42 Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. MSN3700C/VMOD0008, BIOS 5.11 10/10/2018 Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work RIP: 0010:objagg_obj_parent_assign+0xb5/0xd0 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> __objagg_obj_get+0x2bb/0x580 objagg_obj_get+0xe/0x80 mlxsw_sp_acl_erp_mask_get+0xb5/0xf0 mlxsw_sp_acl_atcam_entry_add+0xe8/0x3c0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_entry_create+0x5e/0xa0 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vchunk_migrate_one+0x16b/0x270 mlxsw_sp_acl_tcam_vregion_rehash_work+0xbe/0x510 process_one_work+0x151/0x370 | ||||
| CVE-2023-52801 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2026-08-04 | 8.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: iommufd: Fix missing update of domains_itree after splitting iopt_area In iopt_area_split(), if the original iopt_area has filled a domain and is linked to domains_itree, pages_nodes have to be properly reinserted. Otherwise the domains_itree becomes corrupted and we will UAF. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11562 | 2026-08-04 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WS Form LITE WordPress plugin before 1.11.8 does not have a capability check on one of its settings-update actions, allowing authenticated users with subscriber-level access and above to modify the WS Form LITE WordPress plugin before 1.11.8's settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11880 | 2 Fluent Forms, Wordpress | 2 Fluent Forms, Wordpress | 2026-08-04 | 3.1 Low |
| The Fluent Forms WordPress plugin before 6.2.1 does not properly verify ownership before processing a subscription cancellation request, allowing authenticated users with a low-privilege account to cancel subscriptions belonging to other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11781 | 2026-08-04 | 2.7 Low | ||
| The Adminify WordPress plugin before 4.2.10 does not perform per-user read-capability checks on the results returned by one of its administration search features, allowing users with a low-privilege role (Contributor) to disclose non-public content that WordPress would not otherwise expose to them, such as other authors' unpublished post titles, pending comment content, the site's Adminify WordPress plugin before 4.2.10 inventory, and user account names. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12167 | 1 Little Orbit | 1 Gamefirst Anti-cheat | 2026-08-04 | 7.8 High |
| The Minifilter communication port for driver `GFAC_Sys_x64.sys` in Little Orbit GFAC allows a local attacker to access privileged driver functionality via a communication interface that lacks appropriate access restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10706 | 1 Adalo No-code App Builder | 1 App Builder | 2026-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| In Adalo’s no-code app builder, (Versions 1 and 2) the attackers may extract full user records and correlate user behavior across multiple applications via dbId enumeration. The platform does not implement data minimization, privacy by design, or implement appropriate technical safeguards, allowing sensitive information to be exposed to unauthorized parties. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47830 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 1 Bosh-windows-stemcell-builder | 2026-08-04 | N/A |
| Incorrect Permission Assignment in BOSH.Utils.psm1 in BOSH-Ecosystem bosh-windows-stemcell-builder allows low-privilege authenticated users to overwrite C:\bosh\service_wrapper.exe or C:\bosh\bosh-agent.exe and gain NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on the next service restart or reboot. This can lead to full host control. Affected versions: bosh-windows-stemcell-builder versions prior to v2019.98. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21050 | 1 Samsung Mobile | 1 Samsung Mobile Devices | 2026-08-04 | N/A |
| Improper access control in SmartThingsKit prior to SMR Jul-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to access sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10590 | 1 Lenovo | 57 Ideapad 5 15aba7 Bios, Ideapad Pro 5 16agp11 Bios, Ideapad Pro 5 16asp10 Bios and 54 more | 2026-08-04 | 4.4 Medium |
| A potential missing authentication vulnerability could allow a local privileged attacker to use WMI commands to arbitrarily trigger a System Management Interrupt handler. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41993 | 1 Txone Networks | 2 Safeportagent, Stellarprotect | 2026-08-04 | 4.4 Medium |
| Improper Access Control vulnerability in the Removable Media Validation function of TXOne Networks products allows a local attacker with administrator privileges to bypass the file lockdown mechanism, resulting in unauthorized file transfer to the victim device. The attacker needs to deploy unauthorized file on the removable media in advance. This issue affects SafePortAgent: before 3.2.5024; StellarProtect: from 3.2.4011 before 5.0.1083. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66390 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Api Management | 2026-08-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Microsoft Azure API Management through 2025-10-17, when self-service signup (username/password Basic Authentication) is enabled in Tenant A, an attacker can reuse the registration flow by changing the hostname or tenant identifier to Tenant B, even when Tenant B has signup disabled at the UI level. In other words, disabling signup in the UI does not disable the underlying API endpoint (which still accepts cross-tenant requests based on the Host header). NOTE: The supplier states that they evaluated the report and determined it did not cross a security boundary (i.e., the observed behavior was a configuration/state issue rather than an exploitable product vulnerability affecting tenant isolation). NOTE: The supplier evaluated this report and determined that it did not cross a security boundary (i.e., the observed behavior was a configuration/state issue rather than an exploitable product vulnerability affecting tenant isolation). | ||||
| CVE-2025-68640 | 2026-08-04 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Apple Find My backend service through 2025-12-17 allows an attacker in possession of a valid PET (Private Endpoint Token) to enumerate devices and remove offline devices from an Apple ID account without triggering two-factor authentication or ownership verification. This may result in unauthorized removal of devices associated with the account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21954 | 1 Oracle | 1 Retail Xstore Point Of Service | 2026-08-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service product of Oracle Retail Applications (component: Xstore Mobile). The supported version that is affected is 21.0.3. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Retail Xstore Point of Service accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-35287 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Testing Suite | 2026-08-04 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability in Oracle Application Testing Suite. The supported version that is affected is 13.3.0.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via TCP to compromise Oracle Application Testing Suite. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Application Testing Suite accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2026-46876 | 1 Oracle | 1 Application Testing Suite | 2026-08-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| Vulnerability in Oracle Application Testing Suite. The supported version that is affected is 13.3.0.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via Oracle Net to compromise Oracle Application Testing Suite. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Application Testing Suite. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-46923 | 1 Oracle | 1 Public Sector Financials | 2026-08-04 | 8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Public Sector Financials (International) product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Authorization). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Public Sector Financials (International). While the vulnerability is in Oracle Public Sector Financials (International), attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Public Sector Financials (International). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-46943 | 1 Oracle | 1 Retail Eftlink | 2026-08-04 | 7.4 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Retail EFTLink product of Oracle Retail Applications (component: Core/Plugin). Supported versions that are affected are 21.0.0-25.0.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTPS to compromise Oracle Retail EFTLink. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Retail EFTLink accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Retail EFTLink accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.4 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). | ||||