Export limit exceeded: 13983 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (13983 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-92893 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 2 Red Hat Satellite 6, Satellite | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the foreman_ansible plugin's Ansible inventory API. The controller builds its host query using an unscoped Host.where call that does not enforce the search filter associated with the caller's view_hosts permission. An authenticated user whose host visibility is restricted by a permission filter can supply arbitrary host IDs within their organization and receive the full Ansible inventory for those hosts, including parameter values marked as hidden. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92729 | 1 Signoz | 1 Signoz | 2026-09-18 | 8.2 High |
| SigNoz versions 0.88.0 through 0.141.0 fail to apply authorization wrappers to trace-funnel analytics endpoints in the HTTP handler. Unauthenticated attackers can submit arbitrary funnel definitions to retrieve trace analytics including identifiers, durations, span counts, service topology, and error activity without credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92794 | 1 Opensignlabs | 1 Opensign | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High |
| OpenSign through 2.41.3 fails to validate caller identity in the getDocument cloud function when one-time-password verification is disabled. Attackers can supply a document identifier from guest signing links to retrieve complete document details including all signers' information, sender identity, and valid download tokens without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90923 | 2 Autopay, Wordpress | 2 Autopay, Wordpress | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Autopay WordPress plugin before 5.0.1 does not enforce the signature on one of its payment callbacks, allowing unauthenticated users to disclose and delete the stored payment parameters of other customers' orders. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92611 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Ankaios | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| In Eclipse Ankaios versions 0.6.0 to before 1.0.4, `LogRule::matches` in the agent control-interface authorizer stops at the first wildcard pattern in a single rule instead of evaluating later entries, which can cause deny `LogRule` entries to be skipped and allow unauthorized access to another workload's logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92130 | 1 Jenkins Project | 1 Jenkins Pipeline Multibranch Plugin | 2026-09-18 | 3.1 Low |
| Jenkins Pipeline: Multibranch Plugin 841.vec5b_9e1806ec and earlier does not set the appropriate context for credentials lookup in the resolveScm Pipeline step, allowing attackers with Item/Configure permission to access and capture credentials they are not entitled to. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75017 | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Magazine Blocks – Blog Designer, Magazine & Newspaper Website Builder, Page Builder with Posts Blocks, Post Grid plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.6. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to demote administrator-owned published builder templates (header, footer, front page, single, archive, 404, and search) to draft status and replace them with attacker-authored block content rendered site-wide, enabling defacement, phishing, and SEO spam. This is possible because the mzb-builder-template post type is registered with capability_type='post' and exposed via the REST API, and the _mzb_template meta key is accessible to any user with edit_posts capability, meaning Contributor-level users and above can trigger the vulnerable save_post() hook. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89138 | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Filter Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to overwrite the title and content of arbitrary WordPress posts, write the _wp_attachment_image_alt meta key on arbitrary posts, and create or overwrite arbitrary ufg_gallery_* options. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18317 | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Foxtool All-in-One: Contact chat button, Custom login, Media optimize images plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to modify arbitrary subkeys of the foxtool_settings option, including enabling site-wide SVG uploads by toggling the media-up3 key, which can facilitate stored cross-site scripting via malicious SVG files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89413 | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High | ||
| The Filter Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.4. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to delete any arbitrary Filter Gallery records — including all associated filters, image mappings, settings, and details options — by supplying attacker-controlled gallery IDs. The nonce bypass requires omitting the nonce POST field entirely rather than submitting an invalid value, as a present-but-invalid nonce is correctly rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87028 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Concrete CMS 9 through 9.5.3 did not confirm that a board InstanceItem submitted to the custom-slot preview endpoint belonged to the board instance the requesting user was authorized to edit, and did not enforce page-view permission before generating page-backed summary content. As a result, an authenticated user holding edit-board-contents permission on a single board instance could submit the identifier of an item belonging to a different board instance and receive summary fields, including the page title and description, of an underlying page the same user was otherwise forbidden to view. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 5.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Pakung for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87031 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| n Concrete CMS 9.2.0 through 9.5.3, the REST API user creation endpoint (POST /ccm/api/1.0/users, the add() method of concrete/src/Api/Controller/Users.php) did not perform a permission check before creating an account. As a result, any valid OAuth token carrying the users:add scope, including a client_credentials token with no associated user context, could create active, validated user accounts, bypassing email verification and administrator approval. Under default registration settings the created accounts could then edit page content, providing a path to stored cross-site scripting and further compromise. The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 2.1 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Winston Crooker for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18120 | 1 Concretecms | 1 Concrete Cms | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Concrete CMS before 9.5.3 exposed a legacy Express entry search endpoint that returned entry result JSON without invoking the canViewExpressEntries() permission check applied by the normal dashboard and CSV Export flow. An unauthenticated visitor who knew or discovered an Express entity identifier could enumerate that entity's entry search results, disclosing attribute values intended to be restricted to privileged users. For Express entities that do not support entry-specific permissions (i.e., supportsEntrySpecificPermissions() returns false), per-entry permission filtering is additionally disabled via EntryList::ignorePermissions(). The Concrete CMS security team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4.0 score of 6.3 with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N. Thanks Daniel Powell for reporting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82561 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| Apache NiFi 1.5.0 through 2.11.0 provide REST API methods that replace the entire contents of a Process Group using a client-supplied flow definition, covering Process Group flow replacement together with versioned flow update and rebase operations. Framework authorization for these methods was limited to read and write privileges on the Process Group itself, unlike the corresponding asynchronous update request methods, which also authorize the components encapsulated in the Process Group along with referenced Controller Services, Parameter Contexts, and Parameter Providers. As a result of the missing authorization, an authenticated user with write access to a Process Group could supply a flow definition that modifies or removes components in descendant Process Groups protected by more restrictive access policies, and could bind components to Controller Services and Parameter Contexts without authorization for those referenced components. Existing verification checks limited the impact to stopped components, and the issue applies only to deployments that use component-level authorization policies, because the framework enforces write permissions as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.12.0 is the recommended mitigation, which applies consistent reference resolution and component authorization across Process Group replacement and versioned flow update methods | ||||
| CVE-2026-78426 | 1 Go | 1 Neuvector | 2026-09-18 | 3.7 Low |
| The NeuVector JWT verifier accepts noncanonical Base64URL encodings of the same RSA signature field. An attacker holding a valid JWT that has not expired, but was logged out of NeuVector, can continue using the non-expired token with equivalent spelling of the RSA signature field until the token validity expires. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86043 | 1 Zalando | 1 Skipper | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High |
| Skipper is an HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition. Prior to version 0.27.37, the opaAuthorizeRequestWithBody filter can authorize an oversized request after Skipper truncates the body presented to Open Policy Agent because the input.truncated_body signal is derived from Content-Length rather than the actual read result. In filters/openpolicyagent/openpolicyagent.go, ExtractHttpBodyOptionally truncates bodies at maxBodyBytes, while filters/openpolicyagent/internal/envoy/skipperadapter.go copies the request headers without adding a Content-Length value that reflects the truncation. For an HTTP/1.1 request using Transfer-Encoding: chunked or an HTTP/2 request without Content-Length, a body-inspecting policy that follows the prior mitigation and permits input.truncated_body equal to false can evaluate only the truncated prefix, allow the request, and then forward the full oversized body to the protected upstream. This residual issue is distinct from CVE-2026-50197. This issue is fixed in version 0.27.37. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86089 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Apache NiFi 2.11.0 supports migrating the contents of a version-controlled Process Group into a Connector using REST API methods that list eligible migration sources and submit migration requests. The framework authorized both methods against the target Connector alone, without evaluating access to the Process Groups involved. The absence of Process Group authorization allowed an authenticated user with read access to a Connector to enumerate the identifiers, names, and flow registry details of version-controlled Process Groups outside the scope of granted read policies. It also allowed a user with write access to a Connector to migrate a Process Group without write access to that Process Group, copying the flow definition, referenced assets, and component state into the Connector, and leaving the source Process Group disabled and renamed. Migration excludes sensitive property values and requires the source Process Group to be stopped with empty queues, which limits the scope of exposure. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement component-level authorization policies for Process Groups are not subject to this vulnerability, because the framework enforces Connector write permissions as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.12.0 is the recommended mitigation, which filters migration sources to Process Groups the requesting user is authorized to read, and requires write access to the source Process Group when submitting a migration request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87026 | 1 Tanium | 1 Threat Response | 2026-09-18 | 3.8 Low |
| Tanium addressed an improper access controls vulnerability in Threat Response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81866 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2026-09-18 | N/A |
| Apache NiFi 2.9.0 through 2.11.0 provide Connector configuration update and verification REST API methods that do not enforce authorization checking on Assets and Secrets referenced in proposed configuration. Updating or verifying a Connector configuration step can apply Asset and Secret references, but framework authorization was limited to write privileges on the Connector itself. As a result of the missing authorization, an authenticated user authorized to modify a Connector, but not authorized to read a referenced Parameter Provider, could apply Secret values backed by that Parameter Provider. The same methods also accepted Asset identifiers without verifying that the Asset belonged to the Connector being configured. Apache NiFi installations that do not implement different levels of authorization across Connectors and Parameter Providers are not subject to this vulnerability, because the framework enforces write permissions on the Connector as the security boundary. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.12.0 is the recommended mitigation, which authorizes read access to referenced Parameter Providers and verifies Connector ownership of referenced Assets during configuration update and verification. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92763 | 1 Rundeck | 1 Rundeck | 2026-09-18 | 8.1 High |
| Rundeck through 6.2.1 fails to properly authorize the importConfig and importNodesSources parameters in the project archive import endpoint. Attackers with only the import action can replace project configuration files including security-relevant settings like node executors and SSH key paths that affect job execution. | ||||