Export limit exceeded: 26844 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (26844 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-86831 | 1 Aws | 2 Amazon-vpc-cni-k8s, Aws-network-policy-agent | 2026-09-17 | 8.7 High |
| Improper validation of pod identifier uniqueness in aws-network-policy-agent in Amazon EKS Network Policy Agent before v1.4.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to bypass NetworkPolicy enforcement on co-located pods in other namespaces via crafted pod and namespace names that produce pod identifier collisions. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to Amazon EKS Network Policy Agent 1.4.0 or later and Amazon VPC CNI Managed Add-on v1.22.4 or later (which includes Network Policy Agent v1.4.0). | ||||
| CVE-2026-69210 | 1 Http4s | 1 Http4s | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, WebSocket FrameTranscoder.bodyLength rejects extended payload lengths above Integer.MAX_VALUE but permits negative 64-bit lengths. A remote client that completes a WebSocket handshake through an Ember server can send such a frame, causing the decoder to return an empty frame without advancing its input. The decode loop then runs indefinitely, pins a worker at full CPU, and grows an ArrayBuffer without bound, resulting in denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12150 | 1 Ibm | 1 Mq | 2026-09-17 | 7 High |
| IBM MQ 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.37 LTS, 9.2.0.0 through 9.2.0.43 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.0.41 LTS, 9.3.0.0 through 9.3.5.1 CD, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.0.25 LTS, 9.4.0.0 through 9.4.5.1 CD, and 10.0.0.0 could allow a remote attacker with a trusted TLS client certificate to cause a denial of service and potentially affect memory contents due to improper validation of deeply nested certificate data during TLS certificate processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69318 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Imaging Component allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69369 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 11 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows DNS allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69372 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 11 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.7 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Network File System allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91948 | 1 Freerdp | 1 Freerdp | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| FreeRDP versions before 3.31.0 contain an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in server-side static virtual channel handling when CHANNEL_OPTION_SHOW_PROTOCOL is enabled. Authenticated clients can queue oversized channel messages that cause buffer underflow and corrupt heap memory including live pointers, potentially enabling code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69390 | 1 Microsoft | 21 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 18 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows Spaceport.sys allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69416 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows Server 2012 and 11 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.7 Medium |
| Buffer over-read in Windows DHCP Server allows an authorized attacker to deny service over an adjacent network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69428 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows LDAP - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69572 | 1 Microsoft | 26 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 23 more | 2026-09-17 | 5.7 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows SMB Client allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76797 | 1 Mongodb | 2 Bi Connector Transition Readiness Report, Mongosql Transition Readiness Tool | 2026-09-17 | 6.3 Medium |
| The MongoSQL Transition Readiness Tool writes database and collection names into its generated CSV reports without neutralizing leading characters that spreadsheet applications treat as formulas. A user with write privileges on the cluster can choose a namespace name that is later evaluated as a formula when an operator opens the generated report in a spreadsheet application, which may result in unintended disclosure of report contents or execution of external content on the operator's workstation. Generating a report for the affected namespace and opening it in a spreadsheet application is required. | ||||
| CVE-2026-69267 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 13 more | 2026-09-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient granularity of access control in Windows Connected User Experiences and Telemetry allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91090 | 1 Gpac | 1 Gpac | 2026-09-17 | 3.9 Low |
| A vulnerability was determined in GPAC up to f1219cde. The affected element is the function gf_node_activate_ex of the file scenegraph/base_scenegraph.c. This manipulation causes stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version abi-16.23 is sufficient to fix this issue. Patch name: 9eb40df4448b88d6a6ce3454657c06f47eff0b24. The affected component should be upgraded. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81546 | 1 Canva | 1 Affinity | 2026-09-17 | 7.7 High |
| The Affinity by Canva application before 3.3.0 (September 2026 release) did not perform adequate bounds checking when parsing Affinity document files leading to a stack-based buffer overflow. A threat actor could craft a Affinity document that when opened by a user in Affinity could result in arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10881 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11803 | 1 Autodesk | 3 Autocad, Autocad Lt, Revit | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91843 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Quantum Security Management | 2026-09-17 | 9.8 Critical |
| A stack overflow during the unauthenticated login process may allow an attacker to run arbitrary code remotely with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5946 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 3 Bind, Bind 9, Hummingbird | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple flaws have been identified in `named` related to the handling of DNS messages whose CLASS is not Internet (`IN`) — for example, `CHAOS` or `HESIOD`, or DNS messages that specify meta-classes (`ANY` or `NONE`) in the question section. Specially crafted requests reaching the affected code paths — recursion, dynamic updates (`UPDATE`), zone change notifications (`NOTIFY`), or processing of `IN`-specific record types in non-`IN` data — can cause assertion failures in `named`. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.48, 9.20.0 through 9.20.22, 9.21.0 through 9.21.21, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.48-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39821 | 1 Golang | 1 Net | 2026-09-17 | 9.6 Critical |
| The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in programs using the idna package. For example, a program which performs privilege checks on the ASCII hostname may reject "example.com" but permit "xn--example-.com". If that program subsequently converts the ASCII hostname to Unicode, it will inadvertently permits access to the Unicode name "example.com". | ||||