Export limit exceeded: 378466 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 378466 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 378466 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 378466 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 92610 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (92610 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-62688 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 3 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows MIDI Service Module allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62690 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 13 more | 2026-08-13 | 7 High |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Push Notifications allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71390 | 1 Surrealdb | 1 Surrealdb | 2026-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| SurrealDB before 2.2.6, 2.3.6, and 2.1.8 (and 3.0.0-alpha.7 and earlier) fails to validate DNS-resolved hostnames against --deny-net network access restrictions in its http::* functions. An authenticated user can invoke http::<fn>(<url>) with a hostname that resolves to a denied IP address, causing the server to issue the request anyway and return the response. This bypasses network access controls, allowing access to restricted internal endpoints and potentially retrieving or altering sensitive information and credentials, depending on the deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62692 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 17 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Remote Desktop Services allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62693 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 3 more | 2026-08-13 | 7 High |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows MIDI Service Module allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62695 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 7 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62696 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 15 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Integer underflow (wrap or wraparound) in Windows Program Compatibility Assistant Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53089 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix use-after-free in offloaded map/prog info fill When querying info for an offloaded BPF map or program, bpf_map_offload_info_fill_ns() and bpf_prog_offload_info_fill_ns() obtain the network namespace with get_net(dev_net(offmap->netdev)). However, the associated netdev's netns may be racing with teardown during netns destruction. If the netns refcount has already reached 0, get_net() performs a refcount_t increment on 0, triggering: refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. Although rtnl_lock and bpf_devs_lock ensure the netdev pointer remains valid, they cannot prevent the netns refcount from reaching zero. Fix this by using maybe_get_net() instead of get_net(). maybe_get_net() uses refcount_inc_not_zero() and returns NULL if the refcount is already zero, which causes ns_get_path_cb() to fail and the caller to return -ENOENT -- the correct behavior when the netns is being destroyed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47940 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an Integer Overflow or Wraparound vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48441 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 8.6 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48447 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48410 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48409 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48408 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48407 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48406 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48405 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48404 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48397 | 2 Adobe, Microsoft | 3 Lightroom, Lightroom Classic, Windows | 2026-08-13 | 8.6 High |
| Lightroom Classic is affected by a Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53116 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/ap: use generic driver_override infrastructure When the AP masks are updated via apmask_store() or aqmask_store(), ap_bus_revise_bindings() is called after ap_attr_mutex has been released. This calls __ap_revise_reserved(), which accesses the driver_override field without holding any lock, racing against a concurrent driver_override_store() that may free the old string, resulting in a potential UAF. Fix this by using the driver-core driver_override infrastructure, which protects all accesses with an internal spinlock. Note that unlike most other buses, the AP bus does not check driver_override in its match() callback; the override is checked in ap_device_probe() and __ap_revise_reserved() instead. Also note that we do not enable the driver_override feature of struct bus_type, as AP - in contrast to most other buses - passes "" to sysfs_emit() when the driver_override pointer is NULL. Thus, printing "\n" instead of "(null)\n". Additionally, AP has a custom counter that is modified in the corresponding custom driver_override_store(). | ||||