Export limit exceeded: 92575 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (92575 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-52906 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p: fix access mode flags being ORed instead of replaced Since commit 1f3e4142c0eb ("9p: convert to the new mount API"), v9fs_apply_options() applies parsed mount flags with |= onto flags already set by v9fs_session_init(). For 9P2000.L, session_init sets V9FS_ACCESS_CLIENT as the default, so when the user mounts with "access=user", both bits end up set. Access mode checks compare against exact values, so having both bits set matches neither mode. This causes v9fs_fid_lookup() to fall through to the default switch case, using INVALID_UID (nobody/65534) instead of current_fsuid() for all fid lookups. Root is then unable to chown or perform other privileged operations. Fix by clearing the access mask before applying the user's choice. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35318 | 2 Oracle, Orcacle | 2 Webcenter Sites, Webcenter Sites | 2026-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Sites product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: WebCenter Sites). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle WebCenter Sites. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle WebCenter Sites. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-27539 | 2 Welcart, Wordpress | 2 Welcart E-commerce, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Welcart e-Commerce <= 2.11.31 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12912 | 2 Libtiff, Redhat | 10 Libtiff, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 7 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in libtiff. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted PixarLog-compressed TIFF image. This issue occurs when decoding Pixarlog codec images with the PIXARLOGDATAFMT_8BITABGR output format and a specific stride value, leading to a heap-based buffer overflow. This could potentially result in arbitrary code execution or a denial of service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-13601 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 7 Yelp, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Yelp due to an overly permissive Content Security Policy (CSP) implementation provided by yelp-xsl. A malicious Flatpak application can open crafted help content through the OpenURI portal. By embedding an untrusted CSS stylesheet within a structured SVG document, attacker-controlled content can bypass Flatpak's intended sandbox isolation, allowing Yelp to evaluate local XML inclusions and disclose arbitrary user-readable host files through remote CSS resource requests. This may result in the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15816 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images, Hummingbird and 2 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in dracut. The die() error-handling function writes its message into a shell script under the initramfs emergency-hook directory without properly shell-quoting it. When the message contains data derived from the DHCP ROOT_PATH option, an attacker on the adjacent network who controls a rogue DHCP server can inject a command-substitution sequence that executes as root the next time dracut sources its emergency hook scripts during standard boot-failure handling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46600 | 1 Golang | 1 Net | 2026-08-13 | 7.5 High |
| Parsing an invalid SVCB or HTTPS RR can panic when the size of a parameter value overflows the message buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72856 | 1 Budibase | 1 Budibase | 2026-08-13 | 8.1 High |
| Budibase versions before 3.40.0 contain an authorization/authentication bypass in the PUT /api/global/users/tenant/owner (changeTenantOwnerEmail) endpoint. On self-hosted instances (SELF_HOSTED or DISABLE_ACCOUNT_PORTAL set), the cloudRestricted middleware is a no-op and the route is protected only by a general authentication check, so any authenticated user — including a lowest-privilege BASIC app user — can reassign the tenant account-holder (top-privilege admin) email to an attacker-controlled address. The attacker can then use the public password-reset flow to take over the admin account, leading to full administrative access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72853 | 1 Budibase | 1 Budibase | 2026-08-13 | 7.6 High |
| Budibase before 3.40.0 contains a SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle datasource connector's post-write row lookup that fails to escape table names in identifiers. Attackers with write permission on a table with a double-quote in its name can inject SQL that executes as the datasource's database user to read or modify arbitrary data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59327 | 1 Cpsd | 1 Cryptopro Secure Disk | 2026-08-13 | 7.5 High |
| In CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4, bootxsa.efi fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65370 | 1 Apple | 1 Servicetalk | 2026-08-13 | 7.5 High |
| ServiceTalk HTTP/1.x incorrectly handles malformed Transfer-Encoding which could result in request smuggling attacks. This vulnerability is addressed in servicetalk version 0.42.65. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28188 | 2 Themefic, Wordpress | 2 Hydra Booking, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Hydra Booking <= 1.2.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19750 | 1 Tenda | 3 Ch, Cp, Tx3 | 2026-08-13 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw has been found in Tenda CH, CP and TX3 V21.x/V22.x/V25.x/V26.x/V27.x. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component SSH. Executing a manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded password. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The attack requires a high level of complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72677 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) in Kibana can lead to the unauthorized deletion of Kibana resources via Relative Path Traversal (CAPEC-139). Kibana Fleet accepted a user-supplied identifier for a Fleet Server host configuration without rejecting relative traversal sequences. The identifier is stored as provided and is later incorporated into the request that Kibana issues when that configuration is removed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72675 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to cross-space information disclosure and unauthorized data modification via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Kibana Machine Learning carries out its Elasticsearch operations with elevated internal permissions and relies on a per-request space filter to keep the machine learning data of one space separated from another. Part of the Machine Learning functionality did not apply that filter, so operations issued from one space were carried out against the machine learning data of every space in the deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72672 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| The Elastic Security capability that suggests existing field values while a user authors endpoint policy artifacts queries Elastic Defend event data with Kibana's internal Elasticsearch account instead of the account of the requesting user. Only Kibana feature privileges are verified, and the caller's Elasticsearch index privileges are not. An authenticated user who holds Elastic Security feature privileges but no read access to the Elastic Defend event indices can therefore retrieve field values from that data, including process command line arguments, which commonly contain tokens, credentials, connection strings, and other sensitive operational detail from protected hosts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72670 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| A lower privileged user who holds only the privilege to read agent policies can read the entire configuration of a configured Fleet proxy. This would normally require the Fleet privilege to read settings.The proxy configuration possibly contains proxy authentication credentials and private key material that they should not be authorized to view. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72669 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.6 High |
| The state that Kibana stores for an Observability Onboarding flow is not bound to the user who created the flow, and the routes that read and update that state do not verify ownership. An authenticated user who holds only generic read access to the space can therefore discover the onboarding flows of other users, read their onboarding state, and write arbitrary progress data into them. A tampered flow can also cause the owner's onboarding view to fail with a server error. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72658 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Cross Site Request Forgery (CAPEC-62). A user who is permitted to create visualizations can save a specially crafted Vega visualization that, when it is opened by another user, causes authenticated requests to be issued to Kibana in the context of the viewing user's session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72643 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-08-13 | 7.1 High |
| Kibana Agent Builder determines whether a caller owns a private agent by comparing a stable user identifier when one is recorded, and falling back to a comparison of the username when it is not. A username is not unique across Elasticsearch authentication realms, so two distinct principals that share a username in different realms are treated as the same owner. This discloses the configuration and instructions of an agent the caller does not own, and allows that agent to be altered or removed. | ||||