Export limit exceeded: 388906 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 15575 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (15575 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-56241 | 1 Aztech | 1 Dsl5005en | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Aztech DSL5005EN firmware 1.00.AZ_2013-05-10 and possibly other versions allows unauthenticated attackers to change the administrator password via a crafted POST request to sysAccess.asp. This allows full administrative control of the router without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3014 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in access control in Tracking 2.1.4 on NightWolf Penetration Testing allows an attacker to access via manipulating request parameters or object references. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64530 | 1 Apollographql | 1 Federation | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Apollo Federation is an architecture for declaratively composing APIs into a unified graph. A vulnerability in versions of Apollo Federation's composition logic prior to 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 allowed some queries to Apollo Router to improperly bypass access controls on types/fields. Apollo Federation incorrectly allowed user-defined access control directives on interface types/fields, which could be bypassed by instead querying the implementing object types/fields in Apollo Router via inline fragments, for example. A fix to versions 2.9.5, 2.10.4, 2.11.5, and 2.12.1 of composition logic in Federation now disallows interfaces types and fields to contain user-defined access control directives. Some workarounds are available. Users of Apollo Rover with an unpatched composition version or are using the Apollo Studio build pipeline with Federation version 2.8 or below should manually copy the access control requirements on interface types/fields to each implementing object type/field where appropriate. Do not remove those access control requirements from the interface types/fields, as unpatched Apollo Composition will not automatically generate them in the supergraph schema. Customers not using Apollo Router access control features (`@authenticated`, `@requiresScopes`, or `@policy` directives) or not specifying access control requirements on interface types/fields are not affected and do not need to take action. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1147 | 1 Opentext | 1 Pvcs Version Manager | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Weak access control in OpenText PVCS Version Manager allows potential bypassing of authentication and download of files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9333 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Permissions bypass in M-Files Connector for Copilot before version 24.9.3 allows authenticated user to access limited amount of documents via incorrect access control list calculation | ||||
| CVE-2024-28087 | 1 Bonitasoft | 1 Bonita Web | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Bonitasoft runtime Community edition, the lack of dynamic permissions causes IDOR vulnerability. Dynamic permissions existed only in Subscription edition and have now been restored in Community edition, where they are not custmizable. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57378 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| Wazuh SIEM version 4.8.2 is affected by a broken access control vulnerability. This issue allows the unauthorized creation of internal users without assigning any existing user role, potentially leading to privilege escalation or unauthorized access to sensitive resources. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1726 | 1 Redhat | 1 Quarkus | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was discovered in the RESTEasy Reactive implementation in Quarkus. Due to security checks for some JAX-RS endpoints being performed after serialization, more processing resources are consumed while the HTTP request is checked. In certain configurations, if an attacker has knowledge of any POST, PUT, or PATCH request paths, they can potentially identify vulnerable endpoints and trigger excessive resource usage as the endpoints process the requests. This can result in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35228 | 1 Wagtail | 1 Wagtail | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| Wagtail is an open source content management system built on Django. Due to an improperly applied permission check in the `wagtail.contrib.settings` module, a user with access to the Wagtail admin and knowledge of the URL of the edit view for a settings model can access and update that setting, even when they have not been granted permission over the model. The vulnerability is not exploitable by an ordinary site visitor without access to the Wagtail admin. Patched versions have been released as Wagtail 6.0.5 and 6.1.2. Wagtail releases prior to 6.0 are unaffected. Users are advised to upgrade. Site owners who are unable to upgrade to a patched version can avoid the vulnerability in `ModelViewSet` by registering the model as a snippet instead. No workaround is available for `wagtail.contrib.settings`. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29557 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| ExaGrid EX10 6.3 - 7.0.1.P08 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control in the MailConfiguration API endpoint, where users with operator-level privileges can issue an HTTP request to retrieve SMTP credentials, including plaintext passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1259 | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High | ||
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with OpenConfig configured, a gNOI request can be run when it should have been rejected. This issue can result in users retrieving data that should not have been available | ||||
| CVE-2025-29315 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| An issue in the Shiro-based RBAC (Role-based Access Control) mechanism of OpenDaylight Service Function Chaining (SFC) Subproject SFC Sodium-SR4 and below allows attackers to execute privileged operations via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1260 | 1 Arista | 1 Eos | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with OpenConfig configured, a gNOI request can be run when it should have been rejected. This issue can result in unexpected configuration/operations being applied to the switch. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30112 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| On 70mai Dash Cam 1S devices, by connecting directly to the dashcam's network and accessing the API on port 80 and RTSP on port 554, an attacker can bypass the device authorization mechanism from the official mobile app that requires a user to physically press on the power button during a connection. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1815 | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High | ||
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in pbrong hrms up to 1.0.1. This affects the function HrmsDB of the file \resource\resource.go. The manipulation of the argument user_cookie leads to improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32969 | 1 Vantage6 | 1 Vantage6 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| vantage6 is an open-source infrastructure for privacy preserving analysis. Collaboration administrators can add extra organizations to their collaboration that can extend their influence. For example, organizations that they include can then create new users for which they know the passwords, and use that to read task results of other collaborations that that organization is involved in. This is only relatively trusted users - with access to manage a collaboration - are able to do this, which reduces the impact. This vulnerability was patched in version 4.5.0rc3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2686 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in mingyuefusu 明月复苏 tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 up to d4836f6b49cd0ac79a4021b15ce99ff7229d4694 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is the function doFilter of the file /admin/ of the component Backend. The manipulation of the argument Request leads to improper access controls. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11030 | 1 Tutorials-website | 1 Employee Management System | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was detected in Tutorials-Website Employee Management System up to 611887d8f8375271ce8abc704507d46340837a60. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /admin/all-applied-leave.php of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product utilizes a rolling release system for continuous delivery, and as such, version information for affected or updated releases is not disclosed. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36832 | 1 Wpindeed | 1 Ultimate Membership Pro | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Ultimate Membership Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in versions between, and including, 7.3 to 8.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to login as any user, including the site administrator with a default user ID of 1, via the username or user ID. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32882 | 1 Wagtail | 1 Wagtail | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low |
| Wagtail is an open source content management system built on Django. In affected versions if a model has been made available for editing through the `wagtail.contrib.settings` module or `ModelViewSet`, and the `permission` argument on `FieldPanel` has been used to further restrict access to one or more fields of the model, a user with edit permission over the model but not the specific field can craft an HTTP POST request that bypasses the permission check on the individual field, allowing them to update its value. This vulnerability is not exploitable by an ordinary site visitor without access to the Wagtail admin, or by a user who has not been granted edit access to the model in question. The editing interfaces for pages and snippets are also unaffected. Patched versions have been released as Wagtail 6.0.3 and 6.1. Wagtail releases prior to 6.0 are unaffected. Users are advised to upgrade. Site owners who are unable to upgrade to a patched version can avoid the vulnerability as follows: 1.For models registered through `ModelViewSet`, register the model as a snippet instead; 2. For settings models, place the restricted fields in a separate settings model, and configure permission at the model level. | ||||