Export limit exceeded: 11762 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 11762 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11762 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-27172 | 1 Toshibatec | 50 E-studio-2010-ac, E-studio-2015-nc, E-studio-2018 A and 47 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Remote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution. As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10353 | 1 Melistechnology | 1 Melis Platform | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| File upload leading to remote code execution (RCE) in the “melis-cms-slider” module of Melis Technology's Melis Platform. This vulnerability allows an attacker to upload a malicious file via a POST request to '/melis/MelisCmsSlider/MelisCmsSliderDetails/saveDetailsForm' using the 'mcsdetail_img' parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2020-37186 | 1 Chevereto | 1 Chevereto | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Chevereto 3.13.4 Core contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious code during database configuration installation. Attackers can manipulate the database table prefix parameter to write a PHP shell file and execute arbitrary system commands through a crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6116 | 1 Hanwhavision | 1 Xrn-420s | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High |
| Team ENVY, a Security Research TEAM has found a flaw that allows for a remote code execution on the camera. An attacker could inject malicious into http request packets to execute arbitrary code. The manufacturer has released patch firmware for the flaw, please refer to the manufacturer's report for details and workarounds. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27234 | 1 Zabbix | 4 Zabbix, Zabbix-agent, Zabbix-agent2 and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Zabbix Agent 2 smartctl plugin does not properly sanitize smart.disk.get parameters, allowing an attacker to inject unexpected arguments into the smartctl command. In Zabbix 5.0 this allows for remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6161 | 2 Pjgalbraith, Wordpress | 2 Default Thumbnail Plus, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Default Thumbnail Plus plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'get_cache_image' function in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level and above permissions, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4635 | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium | ||
| A malicious user with administrative privileges in the web portal would be able to manipulate the Diagnostics module to obtain remote code execution on the local device as a low privileged user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49091 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| KDE Konsole before 25.04.2 allows remote code execution in a certain scenario. It supports loading URLs from the scheme handlers such as a ssh:// or telnet:// or rlogin:// URL. This can be executed regardless of whether the ssh, telnet, or rlogin binary is available. In this mode, there is a code path where if that binary is not available, Konsole falls back to using /bin/bash for the given arguments (i.e., the URL) provided. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9849 | 1 Creativeinteractivemedia | 1 Real3d Flipbook | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Real3D Flipbook Lite – 3D FlipBook, PDF Viewer, PDF Embedder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the 'r3dfb_save_thumbnail_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 4.8. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9639 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| Remote Code Execution vulnerabilities are present in ASPECT if session administra-tor credentials become compromised. This issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.08.03; NEXUS Series: through 3.08.03; MATRIX Series: through 3.08.03. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39715 | 1 Veeam | 1 Service Provider Console | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A code injection vulnerability that allows a low-privileged user with REST API access granted to remotely upload arbitrary files to the VSPC server using REST API, leading to remote code execution on VSPC server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27173 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Remote Command program allows an attacker to get Remote Code Execution by overwriting existing Python files containing executable code. This vulnerability can be executed in combination with other vulnerabilities and difficult to execute alone. So, the CVSS score for this vulnerability alone is lower than the score listed in the "Base Score" of this vulnerability. For detail on related other vulnerabilities, please ask to the below contact point. https://www.toshibatec.com/contacts/products/ As for the affected products/models/versions, see the reference URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-61927 | 1 Capricorn86 | 1 Happy-dom | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| Happy DOM is a JavaScript implementation of a web browser without its graphical user interface. Happy DOM v19 and lower contains a security vulnerability that puts the owner system at the risk of RCE (Remote Code Execution) attacks. A Node.js VM Context is not an isolated environment, and if the user runs untrusted JavaScript code within the Happy DOM VM Context, it may escape the VM and get access to process level functionality. It seems like what the attacker can get control over depends on if the process is using ESM or CommonJS. With CommonJS the attacker can get hold of the `require()` function to import modules. Happy DOM has JavaScript evaluation enabled by default. This may not be obvious to the consumer of Happy DOM and can potentially put the user at risk if untrusted code is executed within the environment. Version 20.0.0 patches the issue by changing JavaScript evaluation to be disabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9701 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability has been identified in the Kedro ShelveStore class (version 0.19.8). This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute arbitrary Python code via deserialization of malicious payloads, potentially leading to a full system compromise. The ShelveStore class uses Python's shelve module to manage session data, which relies on pickle for serialization. Crafting a malicious payload and storing it in the shelve file can lead to RCE when the payload is deserialized. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5404 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Server receiving a malformed message can cause a pointer to be overwritten which can result in a remote code execution or failure. See Honeywell Security Notification for recommendations on upgrading and versioning. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6127 | 1 Bcsecurity | 1 Empire | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| BC Security Empire before 5.9.3 is vulnerable to a path traversal issue that can lead to remote code execution. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability over HTTP by acting as a normal agent, completing all cryptographic handshakes, and then triggering an upload of payload data containing a malicious path. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42967 | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| SAP S/4HANA and SAP SCM Characteristic Propagation has remote code execution vulnerability. This allows an attacker with user level privileges to create a new report with his own code potentially gaining full control of the affected SAP system causing high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2013-10058 | 1 Linksys | 2 Wrt160nl, Wrt160nv2 | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An authenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in various Linksys router models (tested on WRT160Nv2) running firmware version v2.0.03 via the apply.cgi endpoint. The web interface fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input passed to the ping_size parameter during diagnostic operations. An attacker with valid credentials can inject arbitrary shell commands, enabling remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15579 | 1 Opentext | 1 Directory Services | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in OpenText™ Directory Services allows Object Injection. The vulnerability could lead to remote code execution, denial of service, or privilege escalation. This issue affects Directory Services: before 24.4.16, from 25.1 before 25.1.9, from 25.2 before 25.2.9, from 25.3 before 25.3.8, from 25.4 before 25.4.5, from 26.1 before 26.1.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43663 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| There are many buffer overflow vulnerabilities present in several CGI binaries of the charging station.This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC model chargers beforeversion 24120701. Likelihood: High – Given the prevalence of these buffer overflows, and the clear error message of the web server, an attacker is very likely to be able to find these vulnerabilities. Impact: Low – Usually, overflowing one of these buffers just causes a segmentation fault of the CGI binary, which causes the web server to return a 502 Bad Gateway error. However the webserver itself is not affected, and no DoS can be achieved. Abusing these buffer overflows in a meaningful way requires highly technical knowledge, especially since ASLR also seems to be enabled on the charging station. However, a skilled attacker might be able to use one of these buffer overflows to obtain remote code execution. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack has a small impact on the availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:L). There is no impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). While this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not expect this vulnerability to have a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||