Export limit exceeded: 386778 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 386778 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (386778 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-51678 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setSyslogCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter logging behavior via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84366 | 1 Scrapy | 1 Scrapy | 2026-09-02 | 7.4 High |
| Scrapy is a high-level web crawling and scraping framework for Python. Prior to 2.17.0, in scrapy/core/downloader/handlers/s3.py, Scrapy's S3DownloadHandler converts an S3-scheme bucket and key request into a plaintext HTTP request to the corresponding S3 endpoint unless request.meta["is_secure"] is explicitly enabled, then signs and sends the plaintext request with configured AWS credentials. A network attacker who can observe traffic between Scrapy and S3 can read the bucket and key path, AWS Authorization header, X-Amz-Security-Token when temporary credentials are used, S3 object contents, and S3 response headers. An active man-in-the-middle attacker can also modify the plaintext S3 response body, status code, and headers before Scrapy processes them, causing scraped-data poisoning, poisoned exports, HTTP cache poisoning when caching is enabled, or influence over later crawl targets through forged redirects or attacker-controlled links. Users making S3-scheme requests with AWS credentials are affected. This issue is fixed in version 2.17.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73745 | 2026-09-02 | 3.1 Low | ||
| A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to view some information handled by the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain insight into internal services and workflows, increasing the risk of unauthorized access when combined with other vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78608 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Missing Authorization (CWE-862) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). An authorization control was not applied to an internal Kibana APM integration function, allowing any authenticated Kibana user to read APM server credentials that should be restricted to users holding APM or Fleet administrative privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51683 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setLanCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter LAN network configuration via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51702 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setIpPortFilterRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter firewall policies via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51703 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.4 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setWiFiScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter when Wi-Fi is available via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51714 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the setRoamingCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to alter roaming behavior via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51732 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the delWiFiScheduleCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to remove Wi-Fi schedule entries via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51735 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in the showSyslog function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to retrieve recent system logs via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51739 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the CloudSrvVersionCheck function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger cloud update checks via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71257 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Apache Wicket enforces the upload limits configured on a form or upload field while parsing a multipart request with Apache Commons FileUpload. If the request body has already been consumed by another component, Commons FileUpload returns no items and Wicket falls back to reading the upload through HttpServletRequest#getParts(). The per-file size limit (for example Form#setFileMaxSize) and the file count limit (Form#setFileCountMax) are not applied to the parts obtained that way, and no exception is raised, so the upload is processed as though those limits had been satisfied. A remote uploader can therefore submit files that are larger, or more numerous, than the application permits, up to whatever the component that parsed the request allows. A part carrying no Content-Type header is additionally read into memory in full during parsing, so the size of that allocation is determined by the request and bounded only by those same external limits. The total upload size limit (Form#setMaxSize) is not affected. Commons FileUpload compares the declared Content-Length against it before reading the body, so a request declaring an oversized length is rejected before the fallback is reached. The fallback is reached in deployments where a servlet or filter has already parsed the request body — for example a servlet annotated with @MultipartConfig, Spring Boot's multipart resolver, or any filter that calls HttpServletRequest#getParameter() on a multipart request. It applies to the Wicket components that accept uploads on that path, including Form with FileUploadField, FileUploadToResourceField and AjaxFileDropBehavior. Applications that configure neither a per-file nor a file-count limit are not affected, as Wicket applies neither by default. This issue affects Apache Wicket: from 8.0.0 through 8.18.0, from 9.0.0 through 9.23.0, from 10.0.0 through 10.10.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 8.19.0, 9.24.0 or 10.11.0, which fix the issue. Users of Apache Wicket 7.x or older, which are no longer supported, should upgrade to a supported version. As a workaround, configure equivalent limits in the component that parses the request — for example spring.servlet.multipart.max-file-size and max-request-size, or maxFileSize and maxRequestSize in @MultipartConfig or in the web.xml <multipart-config> element. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51742 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the discoverWan function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger WAN discovery logic via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51748 | 1 Totolink | 1 T6 | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Incorrect access control in the sendStaticInfoToMaster function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to update stored slave inventory records via sending a crafted MQTT message to the cs_broker component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52295 | 1 Ffmpeg | 1 Ffmpeg | 2026-09-02 | N/A |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Ffmpeg v.7.0 and after allows an attacker to cause a denial of service via the libavformat/iamf_writer.c component | ||||
| CVE-2026-58567 | 1 Dell | 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more | 2026-09-02 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84311 | 1 Py-pdf | 1 Pypdf | 2026-09-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.16.1, an attacker can craft a PDF that causes pypdf/_page.py PageObject._extract_text and PageObject.extract_xform_text to traverse a directed acyclic graph of reused form XObjects in which each form invokes a child multiple times, creating exponentially many traversal paths and causing long runtimes and large memory consumption. This issue is fixed in version 6.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72693 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images, Hummingbird and 2 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.8 High |
| `openvt -u` is intended to identify the owner of the current VT and then execute `login` as that user from a privileged context. In the documented `kbrequest`/init usage, the ownership test in `authenticate_user()` relies on `stat("/proc/<pid>/fd/0")`. `stat()` on `/proc/<pid>/fd/0` follows the symlink to the underlying TTY device node. As a result, `buf.st_uid` reflects the owner of the TTY node rather than the owner of the process holding the file descriptor. If the TTY owner returns to `root` or the getty owner after logout while an unprivileged process still has `fd 0` attached to that TTY, the check can incorrectly treat that process as belonging to the privileged console owner. Once that check succeeds, the `-u` path executes a passwordless login as the selected user. In the documented `kbrequest`/init deployment using `openvt -us`, this can result in passwordless `login -f root` on the spawned VT. This report establishes that privilege escalation path for that documented deployment; it does not claim equivalent reachability for deployments that do not use `openvt -u` from a privileged `kbrequest`/init path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84369 | 1 Svg | 1 Svgo | 2026-09-02 | 6.1 Medium |
| SVGO, short for SVG Optimizer, is a Node.js library and command-line application for optimizing SVG files. From version 1.0.0 until versions 2.8.4, 3.3.5, and 4.1.0, the opt-in removeScripts plugin, named removeScriptElement in versions 2 and 3 and implemented in plugins/removeScripts.js, removes SVG and XHTML script elements but does not inspect executable HTML content inside SVG foreignObject elements. Event-handler attributes such as onload and onbeforetoggle, srcdoc documents, and executable URLs in the action, data, formaction, href, and src attributes can remain in attacker-controlled SVG input. When an application uses the plugin as its only protection and serves the optimized SVG in an active browser context, the payload can execute script in the viewer's origin, expose data, modify content, or perform actions as the victim. This issue is fixed in versions 2.8.4, 3.3.5, and 4.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15816 | 1 Redhat | 10 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Hardened Images and 7 more | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in dracut. The die() error-handling function writes its message into a shell script under the initramfs emergency-hook directory without properly shell-quoting it. When the message contains data derived from the DHCP ROOT_PATH option, an attacker on the adjacent network who controls a rogue DHCP server can inject a command-substitution sequence that executes as root the next time dracut sources its emergency hook scripts during standard boot-failure handling. | ||||