| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u65, 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via vectors related to JMX. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77 and Java SE Embedded 8u77 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Serialization. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to 2D. NOTE: the previous information is from the April 2016 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that this issue allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via crafted font data, which triggers an out-of-bounds read. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u77 and Java SE Embedded 8u77 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via vectors related to JCE. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to 2D. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java SE component in Oracle Java SE 7u60 and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4220. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u81, 7u67, and 8u20 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-6493, CVE-2014-6503, and CVE-2014-6532. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u80 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Hotspot. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u65, 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Security. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u101 and 8u92 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to JavaFX. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 8u92 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to Install. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u113, 7u99, and 8u77 and Java SE Embedded 8u77 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to the Hotspot sub-component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u60 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-2483. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Hotspot. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u65, 6u75, 7u60, and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u85, 7u72, and 8u25 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u60 and 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Serviceability. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java SE component in Oracle Java SE 7u60 and SE 8u5 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Hotspot. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java SE component in Oracle Java SE Java SE 7u60 and OpenJDK 7 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Libraries, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-4223. NOTE: the previous information is from the July 2014 CPU. Oracle has not commented on another vendor's claim that the issue is related to improper restriction of the "use of privileged annotations." |