| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability has been identified in POWER METER SICAM Q100 (7KG9501-0AA01-0AA1) (All versions < V2.50), POWER METER SICAM Q100 (7KG9501-0AA01-2AA1) (All versions < V2.50), POWER METER SICAM Q100 (7KG9501-0AA31-0AA1) (All versions < V2.50), POWER METER SICAM Q100 (7KG9501-0AA31-2AA1) (All versions < V2.50), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8500-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P850 (7KG8501-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA00-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA10-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8550-0AA30-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA01-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA02-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA11-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA12-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA31-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-0AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM P855 (7KG8551-0AA32-2AA0) (All versions < V3.10), SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate the Language-parameter in requests to the web interface on port 443/tcp. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to crash the device (followed by an automatic reboot) or to execute arbitrary code on the device. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SICAM T (All versions < V3.0). Affected devices do not properly validate parameters of POST requests. This could allow an authenticated attacker to set the device to a denial of service state or to control the program counter and, thus, execute arbitrary code on the device. |
| App lock verification bypass vulnerability in the file management app. Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect service confidentiality. |
| EnzoH has an OS command injection vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to arbitrary command execution. |
| EnzoH has an OS command injection vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to arbitrary command execution. |
| EnzoH has an OS command injection vulnerability. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to arbitrary command execution. |
| Entrust nShield Connect XC, nShield 5c, and nShield HSMi through 13.6.11, or 13.7, allow a physically proximate attacker with elevated privileges to falsify tamper events by accessing internal components. |
| An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP AI Core. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers to compromise the security of the system.
We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version:
QNAP AI Core 3.4.1 and later |
| Exposure of Environmental Variables and arbitrary INI file values to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in The Document Foundation LibreOffice.
URLs could be constructed which expanded environmental variables or INI file values, so potentially sensitive information could be exfiltrated to a remote server on opening a document containing such links.
This issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.8 before < 24.8.4. |
| The web interface of the Silicon Labs Simplicity Device Manager is exposed publicly and can be used to extract the NTLMv2 hash which an attacker could use to crack the user's domain password. |
| The SurveyFunnel – Survey Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5 via several unprotected /wp-json/surveyfunnel/v2/ REST API endpoints. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data from survey responses. |
| The SSP Debug plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to the plugin storing PHP error logs in a predictable, web-accessible location (wp-content/uploads/ssp-debug/ssp-debug.log) without any access controls. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to view sensitive debugging information including full URLs, client IP addresses, User-Agent strings, WordPress user IDs, and internal filesystem paths. |
| yawkat LZ4 Java provides LZ4 compression for Java. Insufficient clearing of the output buffer in Java-based decompressor implementations in lz4-java 1.10.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to read previous buffer contents via crafted compressed input. In applications where the output buffer is reused without being cleared, this may lead to disclosure of sensitive data. JNI-based implementations are not affected. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.1. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Verysync 微力同步 up to 2.21.3. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /rest/f/api/resources/f96956469e7be39d of the component Web Administration Module. Such manipulation leads to information disclosure. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| CVE-2025-59595 is an internally discovered denial of service
vulnerability in versions of Secure Access prior to 14.12. An attacker
can send a specially crafted packet to a server in a non-default
configuration and cause the server to crash. |
| A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the text editor feature of the Onlook web application 0.2.32. This vulnerability occurs because user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being directly injected into the DOM via innerHTML when editing a text element. An attacker can exploit this to inject malicious HTML and script code, which is then executed within the context of the preview iframe, allowing for the execution of arbitrary scripts in the user's session. |
| Vulnerability in X25519 constant-time cryptographic implementations due to timing side channels introduced by compiler optimizations and CPU architecture limitations, specifically with the Xtensa-based ESP32 chips. If targeting Xtensa it is recommended to use the low memory implementations of X25519, which is now turned on as the default for Xtensa. |
| Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 KeyShareEntry parsing in wolfSSL v5.8.2 on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial-of-service by sending a crafted ClientHello message containing duplicate KeyShareEntry values for the same supported group, leading to excessive CPU and memory consumption during ClientHello processing. |
| Improper input validation in the TLS 1.3 CertificateVerify signature algorithm negotiation in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows for downgrading the signature algorithm used. For example when a client sends ECDSA P521 as the supported signature algorithm the server previously could respond as ECDSA P256 being the accepted signature algorithm and the connection would continue with using ECDSA P256, if the client supports ECDSA P256. |
| Improper Input Validation in the TLS 1.3 CKS extension parsing in wolfSSL 5.8.2 and earlier on multiple platforms allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to potentially cause a denial-of-service via a crafted ClientHello message with duplicate CKS extensions. |
