Export limit exceeded: 403622 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403622 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18839 | 2 Popt-devel, Redhat | 6 Popt-static, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 3 more | 2026-10-08 | 2.2 Low |
| An integer underflow was found in the popt library when formatting help text for option tables that exceed the terminal width. A local user who can cause an application to print help under those conditions may cause that application to crash or fail to display help, resulting in a denial of service of the affected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16182 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow an attacker to cause a denial of service due to a NULL pointer dereference in GraphQL variable processing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16181 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.4 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16179 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow an attacker to cause a heap buffer underwrite and potentially crash the service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16176 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of the length field during memory reallocation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16170 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a heap buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16169 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datapower Gateway 1100 | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16167 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper bounds checking. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16161 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds read. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16159 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.6 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds write. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15819 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to out-of-bounds memory access caused by a strict-weak-ordering violation in a sorting comparator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15784 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14992 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 vulnerable to buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14990 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datapower Gateway 1060 | 2026-10-08 | 9.3 Critical |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14508 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and obtain sensitive information due to a use-after-free. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14273 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107583 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the webmail's message view of the REST API in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.2 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to make the webmail, the administration console and the REST API unavailable by sending a message. The route that renders a received message's HTML replaced each reference to an embedded image in place, with work that grew with the square of the number of references, and wrote the image out for every reference while counting it against its size limit only once. A message whose HTML refers to one small embedded image a very large number of times, opened in the webmail by its recipient, therefore keeps one of the listener's four worker threads busy for minutes and makes it build a document of gigabytes, so that a few such messages leave the HTTP listener unable to answer anybody. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107582 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the REST API (6.3.3 through 6.3.5) and the IMAP PREVIEW response (6.2.22 through 6.3.5) of Progressive Robot hMailServer allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to make the webmail, the administration console and the REST API unavailable by sending a message. To show a snippet of each message in a folder's message list, the server decoded the character entity references of a message that has an HTML part and no text part with a string replacement whose work grew with the square of their number. A received HTML-only message holding a very large number of entity references therefore keeps one of the listener's four worker threads busy for minutes or longer each time the recipient's webmail lists the folder, without the message being opened, so that a few such listings leave the HTTP listener unable to answer anybody. The IMAP PREVIEW response read such text the same way, holding an IMAP thread for each client that asks for the preview of such a message. The flaw is in the server's shared string class, whose replace and remove both ran in quadratic time. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107581 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 processes several IMAP commands from a signed-in account in time quadratic in the command's length or in the number of elements it names, and can be made to hold memory out of proportion to a command. The FETCH data-item parser normalised a BODY[] section with a case-insensitive string replacement that copied the whole item per occurrence and split the item list by repeatedly copying the remainder of the command; the server's case-insensitive search compared a needle afresh at every position, so a long SEARCH TEXT key over a message cost the product of the two lengths; SEARCH message sets and the saved-result marker ($), SORT criteria, HEADER.FIELDS name lists and UID ranges were each read once per message rather than once per command; and a FETCH naming a message's sections very many times read and held every section in memory before sending any. An IMAP command may continue past one line through non-synchronizing literals, so one command can reach about eleven megabytes. The IMAP worker threads are a small pool shared with SMTP and POP3, so a signed-in user sending such commands can make the IMAP, SMTP and POP3 services stop responding (CWE-407) and can consume excessive memory (CWE-400). | ||||
| CVE-2026-107580 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the decoding of message header fields in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to make the IMAP, SMTP and POP3 services, or the webmail, unavailable by sending a message. The server unfolded a decoded header value by finding each line break from the end of the value and removing it, moving the rest of the value each time, so its work grew with the square of the number of line breaks, and an RFC 2047 encoded word may decode to any number of them. A received message whose Subject or other header field holds such a value keeps a worker thread busy for minutes or longer each time the value is read: when the recipient's IMAP client searches, sorts or threads the folder by a header, when the webmail lists the folder, and, where configured, when a rule tests a header, a spam tag is added to the Subject or an abuse report is read during delivery. The IMAP worker threads are shared with SMTP and POP3, so a few such messages stop those services responding. The server's reading of a message header from its file also searched everything read so far after each 4,000 bytes, costing seconds for a header of tens of megabytes. | ||||