| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Incus is a system container and virtual machine manager. Versions 6.21.0 and below allow a user with the ability to launch a container with a custom image (e.g a member of the ‘incus’ group) to use directory traversal or symbolic links in the templating functionality to achieve host arbitrary file read, and host arbitrary file write. This ultimately results in arbitrary command execution on the host. When using an image with a metadata.yaml containing templates, both the source and target paths are not checked for symbolic links or directory traversal. This can also be exploited in IncusOS. A fix is planned for versions 6.0.6 and 6.21.0, but they have not been released at the time of publication. |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WP Chill Modula Image Gallery modula-best-grid-gallery allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Modula Image Gallery: from n/a through <= 2.13.4. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in storeapps Stock Manager for WooCommerce woocommerce-stock-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Stock Manager for WooCommerce: from n/a through < 3.6.0. |
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in YITHEMES YITH WooCommerce Request A Quote yith-woocommerce-request-a-quote allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects YITH WooCommerce Request A Quote: from n/a through <= 2.46.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Metagauss RegistrationMagic custom-registration-form-builder-with-submission-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects RegistrationMagic: from n/a through <= 6.0.6.9. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods PhotoMe photome allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects PhotoMe: from n/a through < 5.7.2. |
| PHPgurukul Online Course Registration v3.1 lacks Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection on all administrative forms. An attacker can perform unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated administrators by tricking them into visiting a malicious webpage. |
| An issue was discovered in the InsertFromURL() function of the Apryse HTML2PDF SDK thru 11.10. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands on the local server. |
| An issue with WordPress directory names in WebPros WordPress Toolkit before 6.9.1 allows privilege escalation. |
| 7-Zip ZIP File Parsing Directory Traversal Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of 7-Zip. Interaction with this product is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation.
The specific flaw exists within the handling of symbolic links in ZIP files. Crafted data in a ZIP file can cause the process to traverse to unintended directories. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of a service account. Was ZDI-CAN-26743. |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in themepassion Ultra Portfolio ultra-portfolio allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Ultra Portfolio: from n/a through <= 6.7. |
| Gitea does not properly verify authorization when canceling scheduled auto-merges via the web interface. A user with read access to pull requests may be able to cancel auto-merges scheduled by other users. |
| Gitea does not properly validate repository ownership when deleting Git LFS locks. A user with write access to one repository may be able to delete LFS locks belonging to other repositories. |
| The web application does not sufficiently verify inputs that are assumed to be immutable but are actually externally controllable. A low-privileged user can modify the parameters and potentially manipulate account-level privileges. |
| GIMP PSP File Parsing Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of GIMP. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file.
The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PSP files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a heap-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-28232. |
| The fix applied in CVE-2025-22228 inadvertently broke the timing attack mitigation implemented in DaoAuthenticationProvider. This can allow attackers to infer valid usernames or other authentication behavior via response-time differences under certain configurations. |
| An attacker could decrypt sensitive data, impersonate legitimate users
or devices, and potentially gain access to network resources for lateral
attacks. |
| This vulnerability arises because there are no limitations on the number
of authentication attempts a user can make. An attacker can exploit
this weakness by continuously sending authentication requests, leading
to a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. This can overwhelm the
authentication system, rendering it unavailable to legitimate users and
potentially causing service disruption. This can also allow attackers to
conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access. |
| This vulnerability occurs when a WebSocket endpoint does not enforce
proper authentication mechanisms, allowing unauthorized users to
establish connections. As a result, attackers can exploit this weakness
to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or perform unauthorized
actions. Given that no authentication is required, this can lead to
privilege escalation and potentially compromise the security of the
entire system. |
| This vulnerability occurs when the system permits multiple simultaneous
connections to the backend using the same charging station ID. This can
result in unauthorized access, data inconsistency, or potential
manipulation of charging sessions. The lack of proper session management
and expiration control allows attackers to exploit this weakness by
reusing valid charging station IDs to establish multiple sessions
concurrently. |
