Export limit exceeded: 415332 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (407 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-3099 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat 3 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-17 5.8 Medium
A flaw was found in Libsoup. The server-side digest authentication implementation in the SoupAuthDomainDigest class does not properly track issued nonces or enforce the required incrementing nonce-count (nc) attribute. This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to capture a single valid authentication header and replay it repeatedly. Consequently, the attacker can bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to protected resources, impersonating the legitimate user.
CVE-2026-3633 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat 3 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-17 3.9 Low
A flaw was found in libsoup. A remote attacker, by controlling the method parameter of the `soup_message_new()` function, could inject arbitrary headers and additional request data. This vulnerability, known as CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) injection, occurs because the method value is not properly escaped during request line construction, potentially leading to HTTP request injection.
CVE-2026-1801 2 Gnome, Redhat 2 Libsoup, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-16 5.3 Medium
A flaw was found in libsoup, an HTTP client/server library. This HTTP Request Smuggling vulnerability arises from non-RFC-compliant parsing in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_line() logic, where libsoup accepts malformed chunk headers, such as lone line feed (LF) characters instead of the required carriage return and line feed (CRLF). A remote attacker can exploit this without authentication or user interaction by sending specially crafted chunked requests. This allows libsoup to parse and process multiple HTTP requests from a single network message, potentially leading to information disclosure.
CVE-2026-1467 2 Gnome, Redhat 2 Libsoup, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-16 5.8 Medium
A flaw was found in libsoup, an HTTP client library. This vulnerability, known as CRLF (Carriage Return Line Feed) Injection, occurs when an HTTP proxy is configured and the library improperly handles URL-decoded input used to create the Host header. A remote attacker can exploit this by providing a specially crafted URL containing CRLF sequences, allowing them to inject additional HTTP headers or complete HTTP request bodies. This can lead to unintended or unauthorized HTTP requests being forwarded by the proxy, potentially impacting downstream services.
CVE-2026-1539 2 Gnome, Redhat 2 Libsoup, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-16 5.8 Medium
A flaw was found in the libsoup HTTP library that can cause proxy authentication credentials to be sent to unintended destinations. When handling HTTP redirects, libsoup removes the Authorization header but does not remove the Proxy-Authorization header if the request is redirected to a different host. As a result, sensitive proxy credentials may be leaked to third-party servers. Applications using libsoup for HTTP communication may unintentionally expose proxy authentication data.
CVE-2026-2443 3 Gnome, Red Hat, Redhat 3 Libsoup, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-16 5.3 Medium
A flaw was identified in libsoup, a widely used HTTP library in GNOME-based systems. When processing specially crafted HTTP Range headers, the library may improperly validate requested byte ranges. In certain build configurations, this could allow a remote attacker to access portions of server memory beyond the intended response. Exploitation requires a vulnerable configuration and access to a server using the embedded SoupServer component.
CVE-2026-3632 3 Gnome, Libsoup, Redhat 3 Libsoup, Libsoup, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-16 3.9 Low
A flaw was found in libsoup, a library used by applications to send network requests. This vulnerability occurs because libsoup does not properly validate hostnames, allowing special characters to be injected into HTTP headers. A remote attacker could exploit this to perform HTTP smuggling, where they can send hidden, malicious requests alongside legitimate ones. In certain situations, this could lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), enabling an attacker to force the server to make unauthorized requests to other internal or external systems. The impact is low, as SoupServer is not actually used in internet infrastructure.
CVE-2005-2958 1 Gnome 1 Libgda2 2026-04-16 N/A
Multiple format string vulnerabilities in the GNOME Data Access library for GNOME2 (libgda2) 1.2.1 and earlier allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.
CVE-2005-3186 3 Gnome, Gtk, Redhat 3 Gdkpixbuf, Gtk\+, Enterprise Linux 2026-04-16 N/A
Integer overflow in the GTK+ gdk-pixbuf XPM image rendering library in GTK+ 2.4.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via an XPM file with a number of colors that causes insufficient memory to be allocated, which leads to a heap-based buffer overflow.
CVE-2003-0549 2 Gnome, Redhat 5 Gdm, Enterprise Linux, Kdebase and 2 more 2026-04-16 N/A
The X Display Manager Control Protocol (XDMCP) support for GDM before 2.4.1.6 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a short authorization key name.
CVE-2006-2452 1 Gnome 1 Gdm 2026-04-16 N/A
GNOME GDM 2.8, 2.12, 2.14, and 2.15, when the "face browser" feature is enabled, allows local users to access the "Configure Login Manager" functionality using their own password instead of the root password, which can be leveraged to gain additional privileges.
CVE-2000-0864 1 Gnome 1 Esound 2026-04-16 N/A
Race condition in the creation of a Unix domain socket in GNOME esound 0.2.19 and earlier allows a local user to change the permissions of arbitrary files and directories, and gain additional privileges, via a symlink attack.
CVE-2003-0548 2 Gnome, Redhat 5 Gdm, Enterprise Linux, Kdebase and 2 more 2026-04-16 N/A
The X Display Manager Control Protocol (XDMCP) support for GDM before 2.4.1.6 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) when a chosen host expires, a different issue than CVE-2003-0549.
CVE-2003-0547 2 Gnome, Redhat 3 Gdm, Kdebase, Linux 2026-04-16 N/A
GDM before 2.4.1.6, when using the "examine session errors" feature, allows local users to read arbitrary files via a symlink attack on the ~/.xsession-errors file.
CVE-2003-0407 1 Gnome 1 Batalla Naval 2026-04-16 N/A
Buffer overflow in gbnserver for Gnome Batalla Naval 1.0.4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long connection string.
CVE-2006-0819 1 Gnome 1 Dwarf Http Server 2026-04-16 N/A
Dwarf HTTP Server 1.3.2 allows remote attackers to obtain the source code of JSP files via (1) dot, (2) space, (3) slash, or (4) NULL characters in the filename extension of an HTTP request.
CVE-2003-0133 2 Gnome, Redhat 2 Gtkhtml, Linux 2026-04-16 N/A
GtkHTML, as included in Evolution before 1.2.4, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via certain malformed messages.
CVE-2004-0889 11 Debian, Easy Software Products, Gentoo and 8 more 16 Debian Linux, Cups, Linux and 13 more 2026-04-16 N/A
Multiple integer overflows in xpdf 3.0, and other packages that use xpdf code such as CUPS, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code, a different set of vulnerabilities than those identified by CVE-2004-0888.
CVE-2003-0080 2 Gnome, Redhat 2 Gnome-lokkit, Linux 2026-04-16 N/A
The iptables ruleset in Gnome-lokkit in Red Hat Linux 8.0 does not include any rules in the FORWARD chain, which could allow attackers to bypass intended access restrictions if packet forwarding is enabled.
CVE-2006-1244 4 Debian, Gnome, Libextractor and 1 more 4 Debian Linux, Gpdf, Libextractor and 1 more 2026-04-16 N/A
Unspecified vulnerability in certain versions of xpdf after 3.00, as used in various products including (a) pdfkit.framework, (b) gpdf, (c) pdftohtml, and (d) libextractor, has unknown impact and user-assisted attack vectors, possibly involving errors in (1) gmem.c, (2) SplashXPathScanner.cc, (3) JBIG2Stream.cc, (4) JPXStream.cc, and/or (5) Stream.cc. NOTE: this description is based on Debian advisory DSA 979, which is based on changes that were made after other vulnerabilities such as CVE-2006-0301 and CVE-2005-3624 through CVE-2005-3628 were fixed. Some of these newer fixes appear to be security-relevant, although it is not clear if they fix specific issues or are defensive in nature.