| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The W3 Total Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to information exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.9.3. This is due to the plugin bypassing its entire output buffering and processing pipeline when the request's User-Agent header contains "W3 Total Cache", which causes raw mfunc/mclude dynamic fragment HTML comments — including the W3TC_DYNAMIC_SECURITY security token — to be rendered in the page source. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to discover the value of the W3TC_DYNAMIC_SECURITY constant by sending a crafted User-Agent header to any page that contains developer-placed dynamic fragment tags, granted the site has the fragment caching feature enabled. |
| A vulnerability has been found in Cesanta Mongoose up to 7.20. This affects the function mg_tls_recv_cert of the file mongoose.c of the component TLS 1.3 Handler. Such manipulation of the argument pubkey leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.21 mitigates this issue. The name of the patch is 0d882f1b43ff2308b7486a56a9d60cd6dba8a3f1. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker with access to a victim's GINA account to bypass a second-password check and read protected emails. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to upload PGP keys with UIDs that do not match their email address. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to cause attacker-controlled certificates to be used for future encryption to a victim by adding the certificates to S/MIME signatures. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an external user to modify GINA webdomain metadata and bypass per-domain restrictions. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to craft a password-tag that bypasses subject sanitization. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to bypass subject sanitization and forge tags such as [signed OK]. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to hide security tags from users by crafting a long subject. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to forge a GINA-encrypted email. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows attackers with a specially crafted email address to read the contents of emails encrypted for other users. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows attackers with a specially crafted email address to claim another user's PGP signature as their own. |
| Code execution in AssistFeedbackService of TECNO Pova7 Pro 5G on Android allows local apps to execute arbitrary code as system via command injection. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 does not properly authenticate the inner message of S/MIME-encrypted MIME entities, allowing an attacker to control trusted headers. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to bypass subject sanitization and forge security tags using Unicode lookalike characters. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows account takeover by abusing GINA account initialization to reset a victim account password. |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.3 allows an attacker to inject HTML into notification emails about new CA certificates. |
| Due to the improper neutralisation of special elements used in an OS command, a remote attacker can exploit an RCE vulnerability in the generateSrpArray function, resulting in full system compromise.
This vulnerability can only be attacked if the attacker has some other way to write arbitrary data to the user table. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getinfo endpoint due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the setinfo endpoint due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL UPDATE command. This can result in a total loss of integrity and availability. |
