Search
Search Results (333505 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0965 | 1 Libssh | 1 Libssh | 2026-02-16 | N/A |
| No description is available for this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0966 | 1 Libssh | 1 Libssh | 2026-02-16 | N/A |
| No description is available for this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0968 | 1 Libssh | 1 Libssh | 2026-02-16 | N/A |
| No description is available for this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2272 | 1 Gimp | 1 Gimp | 2026-02-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| No description is available for this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2366 | 1 Keycloak | 1 Keycloak | 2026-02-16 | 3.1 Low |
| No description is available for this CVE. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40005 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-02-16 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: spi: cadence-quadspi: Implement refcount to handle unbind during busy driver support indirect read and indirect write operation with assumption no force device removal(unbind) operation. However force device removal(removal) is still available to root superuser. Unbinding driver during operation causes kernel crash. This changes ensure driver able to handle such operation for indirect read and indirect write by implementing refcount to track attached devices to the controller and gracefully wait and until attached devices remove operation completed before proceed with removal operation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-38162 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-02-16 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: prevent overflow in lookup table allocation When calculating the lookup table size, ensure the following multiplication does not overflow: - desc->field_len[] maximum value is U8_MAX multiplied by NFT_PIPAPO_GROUPS_PER_BYTE(f) that can be 2, worst case. - NFT_PIPAPO_BUCKETS(f->bb) is 2^8, worst case. - sizeof(unsigned long), from sizeof(*f->lt), lt in struct nft_pipapo_field. Then, use check_mul_overflow() to multiply by bucket size and then use check_add_overflow() to the alignment for avx2 (if needed). Finally, add lt_size_check_overflow() helper and use it to consolidate this. While at it, replace leftover allocation using the GFP_KERNEL to GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT for consistency, in pipapo_resize(). | ||||
| CVE-2025-22026 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-02-16 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: don't ignore the return code of svc_proc_register() Currently, nfsd_proc_stat_init() ignores the return value of svc_proc_register(). If the procfile creation fails, then the kernel will WARN when it tries to remove the entry later. Fix nfsd_proc_stat_init() to return the same type of pointer as svc_proc_register(), and fix up nfsd_net_init() to check that and fail the nfsd_net construction if it occurs. svc_proc_register() can fail if the dentry can't be allocated, or if an identical dentry already exists. The second case is pretty unlikely in the nfsd_net construction codepath, so if this happens, return -ENOMEM. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62676 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlientwindows | 2026-02-16 | 6.4 Medium |
| An Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability [CWE-59] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiClientWindows 7.0 all versions may allow a local low-privilege attacker to perform an arbitrary file write with elevated permissions via crafted named pipe messages. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23766 | 1 Istio | 1 Istio | 2026-02-14 | 3.3 Low |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69634 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-02-14 | 9 Critical |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE: this is disputed by a third party who indicates that exploitation can only occur if an unprivileged user knows the token of an admin user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26303 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26302 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26301 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26300 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26299 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26298 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26297 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26296 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||
| CVE-2026-26295 | 2026-02-14 | N/A | ||
| Not used | ||||