| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management - Global Configuration Management 7.0.3 through 7.0.3 Interim Fix 017, and 7.1.0 through 7.1.0 Interim Fix 004 IBM Global Configuration Management is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 25.0.0 through 25.0.0 Interim Fix 002, 24.0.1 through 24.0.1 Interim Fix 005, and 24.0.0 through 24.0.0 Interim Fix 007 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service or corrupt existing data due to the improper validation of input length. |
| IBM Db2U 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 237210. |
| IBM Cloud Pak System displays sensitive information in user messages that could aid in further attacks against the system. |
| IBM Cloud Pak System is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. |
| IBM Cloud Pak System does not set the secure attribute on authorization tokens or session cookies. Attackers may be able to get the cookie values by sending a http:// link to a user or by planting this link in a site the user goes to. The cookie will be sent to the insecure link and the attacker can then obtain the cookie value by snooping the traffic. |
| IBM Jazz Reporting Service could allow an authenticated user on the host network to obtain sensitive information about other projects that reside on the server. |
| IBM Jazz Reporting Service could allow an authenticated user on the network to affect the system's performance using complicated queries due to insufficient resource pooling. |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.7, 2.3.4.0, 2.3.4.1, and 2.3.5.0 could disclose folder location information to an unauthenticated attacker that could aid in further attacks against the system. |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR 3.12 through 3.12.23 does not invalidate session after a session expiration which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. |
| IBM webMethods Integration Server 12.0 is vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. |
| IBM DB2 Merge Backup for Linux, UNIX and Windows 12.1.0.0 could allow an authenticated user to cause the program to crash due to a buffer being overwritten when it is allocated on the stack. |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR 3.12 through 3.12.23 does not invalidate session after a session expiration which could allow an authenticated user to impersonate another user on the system. |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR 3.12 through 3.12.23 IBM Security ReaQta uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. |
| IBM Cloud Pak System 2.3.3.6, 2.3.3.7, 2.3.4.0, 2.3.4.1, and 2.3.5.0 could allow an authenticated user to perform unauthorized tasks due to improper access controls. |
| IBM watsonx.data 2.2 through 2.2.1 IBM Lakehouse could allow a privileged user to upload malicious files that could be executed server to modify limited files or data. |
| IBM Sterling B2B Integrator versions 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5, and 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1, and IBM Sterling File Gateway versions 6.1.0.0 through 6.1.2.7_2, 6.2.0.0 through 6.2.0.5, and 6.2.1.0 through 6.2.1.1 may expose sensitive information to a remote privileged attacker due to the application returning detailed technical error messages in the browser. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0, and 8.5 could provide weaker than expected security during system administration of security settings. |
| IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1110.00 through FW1110.03, FW1060.00 through FW1060.51, and FW950.00 through FW950.F0 may expose a limited amount of data to a peer partition in specific shared processor configurations during certain operations. |
| IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1110.00 through FW1110.03, FW1060.00 through FW1060.51, and FW950.00 through FW950.F0 could allow a local user with administration privileges to obtain sensitive information from a Virtual TPM through a series of PowerVM service procedures. |
