Search

Search Results (326895 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-39685 2 Debian, Linux 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-01-08 7.1 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: pcl726: Prevent invalid irq number The reproducer passed in an irq number(0x80008000) that was too large, which triggered the oob. Added an interrupt number check to prevent users from passing in an irq number that was too large. If `it->options[1]` is 31, then `1 << it->options[1]` is still invalid because it shifts a 1-bit into the sign bit (which is UB in C). Possible solutions include reducing the upper bound on the `it->options[1]` value to 30 or lower, or using `1U << it->options[1]`. The old code would just not attempt to request the IRQ if the `options[1]` value were invalid. And it would still configure the device without interrupts even if the call to `request_irq` returned an error. So it would be better to combine this test with the test below.
CVE-2025-39686 2 Debian, Linux 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-01-08 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: comedi: Make insn_rw_emulate_bits() do insn->n samples The `insn_rw_emulate_bits()` function is used as a default handler for `INSN_READ` instructions for subdevices that have a handler for `INSN_BITS` but not for `INSN_READ`. Similarly, it is used as a default handler for `INSN_WRITE` instructions for subdevices that have a handler for `INSN_BITS` but not for `INSN_WRITE`. It works by emulating the `INSN_READ` or `INSN_WRITE` instruction handling with a constructed `INSN_BITS` instruction. However, `INSN_READ` and `INSN_WRITE` instructions are supposed to be able read or write multiple samples, indicated by the `insn->n` value, but `insn_rw_emulate_bits()` currently only handles a single sample. For `INSN_READ`, the comedi core will copy `insn->n` samples back to user-space. (That triggered KASAN kernel-infoleak errors when `insn->n` was greater than 1, but that is being fixed more generally elsewhere in the comedi core.) Make `insn_rw_emulate_bits()` either handle `insn->n` samples, or return an error, to conform to the general expectation for `INSN_READ` and `INSN_WRITE` handlers.
CVE-2025-66524 1 Apache 1 Nifi 2026-01-08 8.8 High
Apache NiFi 1.20.0 through 2.6.0 include the GetAsanaObject Processor, which requires integration with a configurable Distribute Map Cache Client Service for storing and retrieving state information. The GetAsanaObject Processor used generic Java Object serialization and deserialization without filtering. Unfiltered Java object deserialization does not provide protection against crafted state information stored in the cache server configured for GetAsanaObject. Exploitation requires an Apache NiFi system running with the GetAsanaObject Processor, and direct access to the configured cache server. Upgrading to Apache NiFi 2.7.0 is the recommended mitigation, which replaces Java Object serialization with JSON serialization. Removing the GetAsanaObject Processor located in the nifi-asana-processors-nar bundle also prevents exploitation.
CVE-2025-39689 2 Debian, Linux 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel 2026-01-08 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ftrace: Also allocate and copy hash for reading of filter files Currently the reader of set_ftrace_filter and set_ftrace_notrace just adds the pointer to the global tracer hash to its iterator. Unlike the writer that allocates a copy of the hash, the reader keeps the pointer to the filter hashes. This is problematic because this pointer is static across function calls that release the locks that can update the global tracer hashes. This can cause UAF and similar bugs. Allocate and copy the hash for reading the filter files like it is done for the writers. This not only fixes UAF bugs, but also makes the code a bit simpler as it doesn't have to differentiate when to free the iterator's hash between writers and readers.
CVE-2025-3547 1 Agent-zero 1 Agent-zero 2026-01-08 6.3 Medium
A vulnerability classified as critical was found in frdel Agent-Zero 0.8.1.2. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /get_work_dir_files. The manipulation of the argument path leads to path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2025-6166 1 Agent-zero 1 Agent-zero 2026-01-08 3.5 Low
A vulnerability was found in frdel Agent-Zero up to 0.8.4. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects the function image_get of the file /python/api/image_get.py. The manipulation of the argument path leads to path traversal. Upgrading to version 0.8.4.1 is able to address this issue. The identifier of the patch is 5db74202d632306a883ccce7339c5bdba0d16c5a. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
CVE-2024-31144 1 Xen 1 Xapi 2026-01-08 3.8 Low
For a brief summary of Xapi terminology, see: https://xapi-project.github.io/xen-api/overview.html#object-model-overview Xapi contains functionality to backup and restore metadata about Virtual Machines and Storage Repositories (SRs). The metadata itself is stored in a Virtual Disk Image (VDI) inside an SR. This is used for two purposes; a general backup of metadata (e.g. to recover from a host failure if the filer is still good), and Portable SRs (e.g. using an external hard drive to move VMs to another host). Metadata is only restored as an explicit administrator action, but occurs in cases where the host has no information about the SR, and must locate the metadata VDI in order to retrieve the metadata. The metadata VDI is located by searching (in UUID alphanumeric order) each VDI, mounting it, and seeing if there is a suitable metadata file present. The first matching VDI is deemed to be the metadata VDI, and is restored from. In the general case, the content of VDIs are controlled by the VM owner, and should not be trusted by the host administrator. A malicious guest can manipulate its disk to appear to be a metadata backup. A guest cannot choose the UUIDs of its VDIs, but a guest with one disk has a 50% chance of sorting ahead of the legitimate metadata backup. A guest with two disks has a 75% chance, etc.
CVE-2025-24700 1 Xylusthemes 1 Wp Event Aggregator 2026-01-08 7.1 High
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Xylus Themes WP Event Aggregator allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects WP Event Aggregator: from n/a through 1.8.2.
CVE-2025-23998 1 Rarathemes 1 The Ultralight 2026-01-08 7.1 High
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Rara Theme UltraLight allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects UltraLight: from n/a through 1.2.
CVE-2024-37937 2 Rarathemes, Wordpress 2 Rara Business, Wordpress 2026-01-08 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Rara Business allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Rara Business: from n/a through 1.2.5.
CVE-2025-55523 1 Agent-zero 1 Agent-zero 2026-01-08 3.5 Low
An issue in the component /api/download_work_dir_file.py of Agent-Zero v0.8.* allows attackers to execute a directory traversal.
CVE-2025-55524 1 Agent-zero 1 Agent-zero 2026-01-08 7.3 High
Insecure permissions in Agent-Zero v0.8.* allow attackers to arbitrarily reset the system via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2024-37508 1 Rarathemes 1 Construction Landing Page 2026-01-08 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Construction Landing Page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Construction Landing Page: from n/a through 1.3.5.
CVE-2024-37503 2 Rarathemes, Wordpress 2 Lawyer Landing Page, Wordpress 2026-01-08 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Lawyer Landing Page allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Lawyer Landing Page: from n/a through 1.2.4.
CVE-2024-37451 2 Rarathemes, Wordpress 2 Travel Agency, Wordpress 2026-01-08 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Travel Agency allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Travel Agency: from n/a through 1.4.9.
CVE-2024-37450 2 Rarathemes, Wordpress 2 Benevolent, Wordpress 2026-01-08 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Benevolent allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Benevolent: from n/a through 1.3.4.
CVE-2024-37435 1 Rarathemes 1 Perfect Portfolio 2026-01-08 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rara Theme Perfect Portfolio allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Perfect Portfolio: from n/a through 1.2.0.
CVE-2025-14966 1 Fastadmin 1 Fastadmin 2026-01-08 4.7 Medium
A vulnerability was determined in FastAdmin up to 1.7.0.20250506. Affected is the function selectpage of the file application/common/controller/Backend.php of the component Backend Controller. Executing manipulation of the argument custom/searchField can lead to sql injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
CVE-2025-59301 1 Deltaww 2 Dvp15mc11t, Dvp15mc11t Firmware 2026-01-08 4 Medium
Delta Electronics DVP15MC11TĀ lacks proper validation of the modbus/tcp packets and can lead to denial of service.
CVE-2024-1574 2 Iconics, Mitsubishielectric 2 Genesis64, Mc Works64 2026-01-08 6.7 Medium
Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in the licensing feature of Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS64 versions 10.97 to 10.97.2, Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS64 versions 10.97 to 10.97.2, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions ICONICS Suite versions 10.97 to 10.97.2, Mitsubishi Electric ICONICS Suite versions 10.97 to 10.97.2, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions GENESIS32 versions 9.7 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric GENESIS32 versions 9.7 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Iconics Digital Solutions BizViz versions 9.7 and prior, Mitsubishi Electric BizViz versions 9.7 and prior, and Mitsubishi Electric MC Works64 all versions allows a local attacker to execute a malicious code with administrative privileges by tampering with a specific file that is not protected by the system.