| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Broadcom RAID Controller is vulnerable to Privilege escalation to root due to creation of insecure folders by Web GUI |
| Broadcom RAID Controller is vulnerable to Privilege escalation by taking advantage of the Session prints in the log file |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable to exposure of private keys used for CIM stored with insecure file permissions |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not provide X-Content-Type-Options Headers |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable to improper session handling of managed servers on Gateway installation |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not safeguard cookies with Secure attribute |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface doesn’t enforce SSL cipher ordering by server |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure default of HTTP configuration that does not safeguard SESSIONID cookie with SameSite attribute |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable to exposure of sensitive data and the keys used for encryption are accessible to any local user on Windows |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable to exposure of sensitive data and the keys used for encryption are accessible to any local user on Linux |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to usage of Libcurl with LSA has known vulnerabilities |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable due to insecure defaults of lacking HTTP Content-Security-Policy headers |
| Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable to improper session management of active sessions on Gateway setup |
| An issue was discovered in FRRouting FRR through 9.0.1. A crash can occur when a malformed BGP UPDATE message with an EOR is processed, because the presence of EOR does not lead to a treat-as-withdraw outcome. |
| An issue was discovered in FRRouting FRR through 9.0.1. A crash can occur when processing a crafted BGP UPDATE message with a MP_UNREACH_NLRI attribute and additional NLRI data (that lacks mandatory path attributes). |
| bgpd/bgp_label.c in FRRouting (FRR) before 8.5 attempts to read beyond the end of the stream during labeled unicast parsing. |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x and, 20.x. The use of the deprecated API `process.binding()` can bypass the policy mechanism by requiring internal modules and eventually take advantage of `process.binding('spawn_sync')` run arbitrary code, outside of the limits defined in a `policy.json` file. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js. |
| Git is a revision control system. Prior to versions 2.30.9, 2.31.8, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, 2.34.8, 2.35.8, 2.36.6, 2.37.7, 2.38.5, 2.39.3, and 2.40.1, by feeding specially crafted input to `git apply --reject`, a path outside the working tree can be overwritten with partially controlled contents (corresponding to the rejected hunk(s) from the given patch). A fix is available in versions 2.30.9, 2.31.8, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, 2.34.8, 2.35.8, 2.36.6, 2.37.7, 2.38.5, 2.39.3, and 2.40.1. As a workaround, avoid using `git apply` with `--reject` when applying patches from an untrusted source. Use `git apply --stat` to inspect a patch before applying; avoid applying one that create a conflict where a link corresponding to the `*.rej` file exists. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/msm/gem: Fix error code msm_parse_deps()
The SUBMIT_ERROR() macro turns the error code negative. This extra '-'
operation turns it back to positive EINVAL again. The error code is
passed to ERR_PTR() and since positive values are not an IS_ERR() it
eventually will lead to an oops. Delete the '-'.
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/637625/ |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: fix to avoid panic once fallocation fails for pinfile
syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2746!
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5323 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-syzkaller-00018-g7cb1b4663150 #0
RIP: 0010:get_new_segment fs/f2fs/segment.c:2746 [inline]
RIP: 0010:new_curseg+0x1f52/0x1f70 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2876
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__allocate_new_segment+0x1ce/0x940 fs/f2fs/segment.c:3210
f2fs_allocate_new_section fs/f2fs/segment.c:3224 [inline]
f2fs_allocate_pinning_section+0xfa/0x4e0 fs/f2fs/segment.c:3238
f2fs_expand_inode_data+0x696/0xca0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1830
f2fs_fallocate+0x537/0xa10 fs/f2fs/file.c:1940
vfs_fallocate+0x569/0x6e0 fs/open.c:327
do_vfs_ioctl+0x258c/0x2e40 fs/ioctl.c:885
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0x80/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Concurrent pinfile allocation may run out of free section, result in
panic in get_new_segment(), let's expand pin_sem lock coverage to
include f2fs_gc(), so that we can make sure to reclaim enough free
space for following allocation.
In addition, do below changes to enhance error path handling:
- call f2fs_bug_on() only in non-pinfile allocation path in
get_new_segment().
- call reset_curseg_fields() to reset all fields of curseg in
new_curseg() |
