| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the Windows Kernel improperly handles key enumeration, aka 'Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles objects in the memory, aka 'GDI+ Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the IOleCvt interface renders ASP webpage content, aka 'Windows IOleCvt Interface Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. |
| A denial of service vulnerability exists when .NET Framework and .NET Core improperly process RegEx strings, aka '.NET Framework and .NET Core Denial of Service Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0980, CVE-2019-0981. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Chakra scripting engine handles objects in memory in Microsoft Edge, aka 'Chakra Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0806, CVE-2019-0812, CVE-2019-0829, CVE-2019-0860, CVE-2019-0861. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the Windows Remote Desktop Client when a user connects to a malicious server, aka 'Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0787, CVE-2019-1290, CVE-2019-1291. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the Windows Remote Desktop Client when a user connects to a malicious server, aka 'Remote Desktop Client Remote Code Execution Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0788, CVE-2019-1290, CVE-2019-1291. |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Exchange Server, aka 'Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0686. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0538, CVE-2019-0575, CVE-2019-0576, CVE-2019-0577, CVE-2019-0578, CVE-2019-0579, CVE-2019-0580, CVE-2019-0581, CVE-2019-0583, CVE-2019-0584. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Xterm.js when the component mishandles special characters, aka "Xterm Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects xterm.js. |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects in memory, aka "Jet Database Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-0575, CVE-2019-0576, CVE-2019-0577, CVE-2019-0578, CVE-2019-0579, CVE-2019-0580, CVE-2019-0581, CVE-2019-0582, CVE-2019-0583, CVE-2019-0584. |
| SAP Enable Now, before version 1911, leaks information about the existence of a particular user which can be used to construct a list of users, leading to a user enumeration vulnerability and Information Disclosure. |
| SAP Enable Now, before version 1911, leaks information about network configuration in the server error messages, leading to Information Disclosure. |
| Due to insufficient CSRF protection, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Monitoring Application), before versions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, may lead to an authenticated user to send unintended request to the web server, leading to Cross Site Request Forgery. |
| SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence HTML interface), corrected in versions 4.1 and 4.2, does not sufficiently validate an XML document accepted from an untrusted source. An attacker can craft a message that contains malicious elements that will not be correctly filtered by Web Intelligence HTML interface in some specific workflows. |
| An administrator of SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java (J2EE-Framework), (corrected in versions 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.31, 7.4, 7.5), may change privileges for all or some functions in Java Server, and enable users to execute functions, they are not allowed to execute otherwise. |
| Transaction Management in SAP Treasury and Risk Management (corrected in S4CORE versions 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 and EA-FINSERV versions 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0) does not perform necessary authorization checks for functionalities that require user identity. |
| Transaction Management in SAP Treasury and Risk Management (corrected in S4CORE versions 1.01, 1.02, 1.03, 1.04 and EA-FINSERV versions 6.0, 6.03, 6.04, 6.05, 6.06, 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 8.0) does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. |
| SAP Kernel (RFC), KRNL32NUC, KRNL32UC and KRNL64NUC before versions 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, KRNL64UC, before versions 7.21, 7.21EXT, 7.22, 7.22EXT, 7.49, 7.73 and KERNEL before versions 7.21, 7.49, 7.53, 7.73, 7.76 SAP GUI for Windows (BC-FES-GUI) before versions 7.5, 7.6, and SAP GUI for Java (BC-FES-JAV) before version 7.5, allow an attacker to prevent legitimate users from accessing a service, either by crashing or flooding the service. |
| Attackers may misuse an HTTP/REST endpoint of SAP HANA Extended Application Services (Advanced model), before version 1.0.118, to overload the server or retrieve information about internal network ports. |