| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure. |
| Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions Prior to 20.3, contain an UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Script injection. |
| Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions prior to 20.3, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access. |
| HCL BigFix Quantum Risk Analyzer has a certain validation process that provides overly descriptive error messages when it encounters malformed input which can allow an attacker to conduct more efficient reconnaissance and fine-tune automated fuzzing tools to produce valid input. |
| Improper symlink resolution before file access in Plesk allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code as root. |
| HCL BigFix Quantum Risk Analyzer is affected by a hardcoded external resource reference and a lack of binary integrity which could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information or modify the binary. |
| HCL BigFix Quantum Risk Analyzer binary lacks several critical, industry-standard hardening protections that could allow an attacker to cause a stack-based buffer overflow. |
| HCL BigFix Quantum Risk Analyzer generates highly detailed logging information by default which increases the risk of sensitive data leakage and can provide an attacker with internal application logic and architectural details. |
| A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general
Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access. |
| Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Reflected XSS via the PDF export link in Joomla Events Manager < 5.0.1 - buildCurrentPdfLink copies the current request query string into the PDF button URL, and pdfbutton() echoes it unescaped, leading to an reflected XSS vector. |
| Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user with edit-own rights (the eventowner=1 setting or core.edit.own) can POST another user's record id together with their own id as created_by and take over that record. |
| Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Attendee lists readable by any logged-in user in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A non-manager can therefore read attendee names, usernames, registration dates and statuses for events they do not manage, including lists belonging to unpublished events. |
| Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Unauthenticated article overwrite and force-publish in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - Any visitor holding their own session token can republish and overwrite an article associated with an event. |
| Medical Practice Management System developed by Le-yan has a Sensitive Data in URL vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can obtain sensitive information via victim's browser history or log files. |
| This vulnerability exists in the CP Plus CP-XR-DE21-S Router due to the presence of hardcoded HTTP Digest authentication credentials in the firmware that are identical across all devices running the affected firmware. An attacker with access to the local network could exploit this vulnerability by obtaining the hardcoded authentication information from the firmware.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access and perform privileged operations on the targeted device. |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Ceviz Informatics Inc. Web Design allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Web Design: through 25082026. |
| Contributor Broken Access Control in ACF Extended <= 0.9.2.6 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Simple Payment <= 2.5.2 versions. |
| wolfProvider before 1.2.2 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected. |
| wolfEngine before 1.4.1 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected. |
