Search

Search Results (334636 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-71222 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-02-18 7.0 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: wlcore: ensure skb headroom before skb_push This avoids occasional skb_under_panic Oops from wl1271_tx_work. In this case, headroom is less than needed (typically 110 - 94 = 16 bytes).
CVE-2026-23200 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-02-18 7.0 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: Fix ECMP sibling count mismatch when clearing RTF_ADDRCONF syzbot reported a kernel BUG in fib6_add_rt2node() when adding an IPv6 route. [0] Commit f72514b3c569 ("ipv6: clear RA flags when adding a static route") introduced logic to clear RTF_ADDRCONF from existing routes when a static route with the same nexthop is added. However, this causes a problem when the existing route has a gateway. When RTF_ADDRCONF is cleared from a route that has a gateway, that route becomes eligible for ECMP, i.e. rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() returns true. The issue is that this route was never added to the fib6_siblings list. This leads to a mismatch between the following counts: - The sibling count computed by iterating fib6_next chain, which includes the newly ECMP-eligible route - The actual siblings in fib6_siblings list, which does not include that route When a subsequent ECMP route is added, fib6_add_rt2node() hits BUG_ON(sibling->fib6_nsiblings != rt->fib6_nsiblings) because the counts don't match. Fix this by only clearing RTF_ADDRCONF when the existing route does not have a gateway. Routes without a gateway cannot qualify for ECMP anyway (rt6_qualify_for_ecmp() requires fib_nh_gw_family), so clearing RTF_ADDRCONF on them is safe and matches the original intent of the commit. [0]: kernel BUG at net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1217! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 6010 Comm: syz.0.17 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025 RIP: 0010:fib6_add_rt2node+0x3433/0x3470 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1217 [...] Call Trace: <TASK> fib6_add+0x8da/0x18a0 net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c:1532 __ip6_ins_rt net/ipv6/route.c:1351 [inline] ip6_route_add+0xde/0x1b0 net/ipv6/route.c:3946 ipv6_route_ioctl+0x35c/0x480 net/ipv6/route.c:4571 inet6_ioctl+0x219/0x280 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:577 sock_do_ioctl+0xdc/0x300 net/socket.c:1245 sock_ioctl+0x576/0x790 net/socket.c:1366 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:597 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:583 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xf80 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
CVE-2026-23648 1 Glory Global Solutions 1 Rbg-100 2026-02-18 7.8 High
Glory RBG-100 recycler systems using the ISPK-08 software component contain multiple system binaries with overly permissive file permissions. Several binaries executed by the root user are writable and executable by unprivileged local users. An attacker with local access can replace or modify these binaries to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges, enabling local privilege escalation.
CVE-2026-2001 2 Wordpress, Wpxpo 2 Wordpress, Wowrevenue – Product Bundles & Bulk Discounts 2026-02-18 8.8 High
The WowRevenue plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized plugin installation due to a missing capability check in the 'Notice::install_activate_plugin' function in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to install arbitrary plugins on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible.
CVE-2026-2101 1 Dassault Systemes 1 Enoviavpm Web Access 2026-02-18 8.7 High
A Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting ENOVIAvpm Web Access from ENOVIAvpm Version 1 Release 16 through ENOVIAvpm Version 1 Release 19 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in user's browser session.
CVE-2026-24734 2 Apache, Apache Tomcat 3 Tomcat, Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat 2026-02-18 7.4 High
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat Native, Apache Tomcat. When using an OCSP responder, Tomcat Native (and Tomcat's FFM port of the Tomcat Native code) did not complete verification or freshness checks on the OCSP response which could allow certificate revocation to be bypassed. This issue affects Apache Tomcat Native:  from 1.3.0 through 1.3.4, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.11; Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.17, from 10.1.0-M7 through 10.1.51, from 9.0.83 through 9.0.114. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: from 1.1.23 through 1.1.34, from 1.2.0 through 1.2.39. Older EOL versions are not affected. Apache Tomcat Native users are recommended to upgrade to versions 1.3.5 or later or 2.0.12 or later, which fix the issue. Apache Tomcat users are recommended to upgrade to versions 11.0.18 or later, 10.1.52 or later or 9.0.115 or later which fix the issue.
CVE-2025-66614 2 Apache, Apache Tomcat 2 Tomcat, Apache Tomcat 2026-02-18 5.3 Medium
Improper Input Validation vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected. Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field. The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate authentication is enforced at the web application. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue.
CVE-2026-22048 1 Netapp 1 Storagegrid 2026-02-18 7.1 High
StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions prior to 11.9.0.12 and 12.0.0.4 with Single Sign-on enabled and configured to use Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD) as an IdP are susceptible to a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an authenticated attacker with low privileges to delete configuration data or deny access to some resources.
CVE-2025-32355 1 Rocketsoftware 1 Trufusion Enterprise 2026-02-18 N/A
Rocket TRUfusion Enterprise through 7.10.4.0 uses a reverse proxy to handle incoming connections. However, the proxy is misconfigured in a way that allows specifying absolute URLs in the HTTP request line, causing the proxy to load the given resource.
CVE-2026-1368 2 Video Conferencing With Zoom Project, Wordpress 2 Video Conferencing With Zoom, Wordpress 2026-02-18 7.5 High
The Video Conferencing with Zoom WordPress plugin before 4.6.6 contains an AJAX handler that has its nonce verification commented out, allowing unauthenticated attackers to generate valid Zoom SDK signatures for any meeting ID and retrieve the site's Zoom SDK key.
CVE-2026-2023 2 Brikou, Wordpress 2 Wp Plugin Info Card, Wordpress 2026-02-18 4.3 Medium
The WP Plugin Info Card plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.0. This is due to missing nonce validation in the ajax_save_custom_plugin() function, which is disabled by prefixing the check with 'false &&'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create or modify custom plugin entries via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-1925 2 Roxnor, Wordpress 2 Emailkit – Email Customizer For Woocommerce & Wp, Wordpress 2026-02-18 4.3 Medium
The EmailKit – Email Customizer for WooCommerce & WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized data modification due to a missing capability check on the 'update_template_data' function in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify the title of any post on the site, including posts, pages, and custom post types.
CVE-2026-1831 2 Wordpress, Yaycommerce 2 Wordpress, Yaymail – Woocommerce Email Customizer 2026-02-18 2.7 Low
The YayMail - WooCommerce Email Customizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized plugin installation and activation due to missing capability checks on the 'yaymail_install_yaysmtp' AJAX action and `/yaymail/v1/addons/activate` REST endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Shop Manager-level access and above, to install and activate the YaySMTP plugin.
CVE-2026-2296 2 Acowebs, Wordpress 2 Product Addons For Woocommerce – Product Options With Custom Fields, Wordpress 2026-02-18 7.2 High
The Product Addons for Woocommerce – Product Options with Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.0. This is due to insufficient input validation of the 'operator' field in conditional logic rules within the evalConditions() function, which passes unsanitized user input directly to PHP's eval() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Shop Manager-level access and above, to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the server via the conditional logic 'operator' parameter when saving addon form field rules.
CVE-2026-1937 2 Wordpress, Yaycommerce 2 Wordpress, Yaymail – Woocommerce Email Customizer 2026-02-18 9.8 Critical
The YayMail – WooCommerce Email Customizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data that can lead to privilege escalation due to a missing capability check on the `yaymail_import_state` AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Shop Manager-level access and above, to update arbitrary options on the WordPress site. This can be leveraged to update the default role for registration to administrator and enable user registration for attackers to gain administrative user access to a vulnerable site.
CVE-2026-1072 2 Jamesits, Wordpress 2 Keybase.io Verification, Wordpress 2026-02-18 4.3 Medium
The Keybase.io Verification plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.5. This is due to missing nonce validation when updating plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the Keybase verification text via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-1640 2 Taskbuilder, Wordpress 2 Taskbuilder – Wordpress Project Management & Task Management,kanban View, Wordpress 2026-02-18 4.3 Medium
The Taskbuilder – WordPress Project Management & Task Management plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.2. This is due to missing authorization checks on the project and task comment submission functions (AJAX actions: wppm_submit_proj_comment and wppm_submit_task_comment). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to create comments on any project or task (including private projects they cannot view or are not assigned to), and inject arbitrary HTML and CSS via the insufficiently sanitized comment_body parameter.
CVE-2026-1639 2 Taskbuilder, Wordpress 2 Taskbuilder – Wordpress Project Management & Task Management,kanban View, Wordpress 2026-02-18 6.5 Medium
The Taskbuilder – WordPress Project Management & Task Management plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based blind SQL Injection via the 'order' and 'sort_by' parameters in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.2 due to insufficient escaping on the user supplied parameter and lack of sufficient preparation on the existing SQL query. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to append additional SQL queries into already existing queries that can be used to extract sensitive information from the database.
CVE-2026-1344 1 Tanium 1 Service Enforce Recovery-key-portal 2026-02-18 6.5 Medium
Tanium addressed an insecure file permissions vulnerability in Enforce Recovery Key Portal.
CVE-2025-70846 1 Lty628 1 Aidigu 2026-02-18 N/A
lty628 aidigu v1.9.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) on the /tools/Password/add page in the input field password.