Search

Search Results (335152 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-3282 1 Libvips 1 Libvips 2026-02-27 3.3 Low
A flaw has been found in libvips 8.19.0. This vulnerability affects the function vips_unpremultiply_build of the file libvips/conversion/unpremultiply.c. Executing a manipulation of the argument alpha_band can lead to out-of-bounds read. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called 7215ead1e0cd7d3703cc4f5fca06d7d0f4c22b91. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
CVE-2024-1394 1 Redhat 23 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 20 more 2026-02-27 7.5 High
A memory leak flaw was found in Golang in the RSA encrypting/decrypting code, which might lead to a resource exhaustion vulnerability using attacker-controlled inputs​. The memory leak happens in github.com/golang-fips/openssl/openssl/rsa.go#L113. The objects leaked are pkey​ and ctx​. That function uses named return parameters to free pkey​ and ctx​ if there is an error initializing the context or setting the different properties. All return statements related to error cases follow the "return nil, nil, fail(...)" pattern, meaning that pkey​ and ctx​ will be nil inside the deferred function that should free them.
CVE-2026-20099 1 Cisco 3 Cisco:adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Extensible Operating System, Unified Computing System Manager 2026-02-27 6.7 Medium
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco FXOS Software and Cisco UCS Manager Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with administrative privileges to perform command injection attacks on an affected system and elevate privileges to root.  This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of command arguments supplied by the user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to a device and submitting crafted input to the affected command. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of the affected device with root-level privileges.
CVE-2025-56605 1 Puneethreddyhc 1 Event Management System 2026-02-27 5.4 Medium
A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the register.php backend script of PuneethReddyHC Event Management System 1.0. The mobile POST parameter is improperly validated and echoed back in the HTTP response without sanitization, allowing an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim's browser.
CVE-2025-71057 1 D-link 1 Wireless N 300 Adsl2+ Modem Router 2026-02-27 8.2 High
Improper session management in D-Link Wireless N 300 ADSL2+ Modem Router DSL-124 ME_1.00 allows attackers to execute a session hijacking attack via spoofing the IP address of an authenticated user.
CVE-2026-26682 1 My-fastcms 1 Fastcms 2026-02-27 7.8 High
An issue in fastCMS before v.0.1.6 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginController.java component
CVE-2025-50857 1 Zentao 1 Zentao Pms 2026-02-27 9.8 Critical
ZenTaoPMS v18.11 through v21.6.beta is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in /module/ai/control.php. This allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file upload
CVE-2025-64999 1 Checkmk 1 Checkmk 2026-02-27 N/A
Improper neutralization of input in Checkmk versions 2.4.0 before 2.4.0p22, and 2.3.0 before 2.3.0p43 allows an attacker that can manipulate a host's check output to inject malicious JavaScript into the Synthetic Monitoring HTML logs, which can then be accessed via a crafted phishing link.
CVE-2026-1198 1 Simple Sa 1 Simple.erp 2026-02-27 N/A
SIMPLE.ERP is vulnerable to the SQL Injection in search functionality in "Obroty na kontach" window. Lack of input validation allows an authenticated attacker to prepare a malicious query to the database that will be executed. This issue was fixed in 6.30@A04.4_u06.
CVE-2025-14343 1 Dokuzsoft Technology 1 E-commerce Product 2026-02-27 7.6 High
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Dokuzsoft Technology Ltd. E-Commerce Product allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects E-Commerce Product: through 10122025.
CVE-2026-2677 1 A3factura 1 A3factura 2026-02-27 N/A
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on the A3factura web platform, in parameter 'name', in 'a3factura-app.wolterskluwer.es/#/incomes/representatives-management' endpoint, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the victim's browser.
CVE-2026-2678 1 A3factura 1 A3factura 2026-02-27 N/A
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on the A3factura web platform, in parameter 'name', parameter 'name', in 'a3factura-app.wolterskluwer.es/#/incomes/customers' endpoint, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the victim's browser.
CVE-2026-2679 1 A3factura 1 A3factura 2026-02-27 N/A
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on the A3factura web platform, in parameter 'customerName', in 'a3factura-app.wolterskluwer.es/#/incomes/salesInvoices' endpoint, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the victim's browser.
CVE-2026-2680 1 A3factura 1 A3factura 2026-02-27 N/A
Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on the A3factura web platform, in parameter 'customerVATNumber', in 'a3factura-app.wolterskluwer.es/#/incomes/salesDeliveryNotes' endpoint, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the victim's browser.
CVE-2026-2244 1 Google Cloud 1 Vertex Ai 2026-02-27 N/A
A vulnerability in Google Cloud Vertex AI Workbench from 7/21/2025 to 01/30/2026 allows an attacker to exfiltrate valid Google Cloud access tokens of other users via abuse of a built-in startup script. All instances after January 30th, 2026 have been patched to protect from this vulnerability. No user action is required for this.
CVE-2026-3071 1 Flair 1 Flair 2026-02-27 8.4 High
Deserialization of untrusted data in the LanguageModel class of Flair from versions 0.4.1 to latest are vulnerable to arbitrary code execution when loading a malicious model.
CVE-2026-26077 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-02-27 6.5 Medium
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, several webhook endpoints (SendGrid, Mailjet, Mandrill, Postmark, SparkPost) in the `WebhooksController` accepted requests without a valid authentication token when no token was configured. This allowed unauthenticated attackers to forge webhook payloads and artificially inflate user bounce scores, potentially causing legitimate user emails to be disabled. The Mailpace endpoint had no token validation at all. Starting in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, all webhook endpoints reject requests with a 406 response when no authentication token is configured. As a workaround, ensure that webhook authentication tokens are configured for all email provider integrations in site settings (e.g., `sendgrid_verification_key`, `mailjet_webhook_token`, `postmark_webhook_token`, `sparkpost_webhook_token`). There's no current workaround for mailpace before getting this fix.
CVE-2026-26078 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-02-27 7.5 High
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, when the `patreon_webhook_secret` site setting is blank, an attacker can forge valid webhook signatures by computing an HMAC-MD5 with an empty string as the key. Since the request body is known to the sender, the attacker can produce a matching signature and send arbitrary webhook payloads. This allows unauthorized creation, modification, or deletion of Patreon pledge data and triggering patron-to-group synchronization. This vulnerability is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0. The fix rejects webhook requests when the webhook secret is not configured, preventing signature forgery with an empty key. As a workaround, configure the `patreon_webhook_secret` site setting with a strong, non-empty secret value. When the secret is non-empty, an attacker cannot forge valid signatures without knowing the secret.
CVE-2026-26207 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-02-27 5.4 Medium
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, `discourse-policy` plugin allows any authenticated user to interact with policies on posts they do not have permission to view. The `PolicyController` loads posts by ID without verifying the current user's access, enabling policy group members to accept/unaccept policies on posts in private categories or PMs they cannot see and any authenticated user to enumerate which post IDs have policies attached via differentiated error responses (information disclosure). The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by adding a `guardian.can_see?(@post)` check in the `set_post` before_action, ensuring post visibility is verified before any policy action is processed. As a workaround, disabling the discourse-policy plugin (`policy_enabled = false`) eliminates the vulnerability. There is no other workaround without upgrading.
CVE-2026-26265 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-02-27 7.5 High
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, an IDOR vulnerability in the directory items endpoint allows any user, including anonymous users, to retrieve private user field values for all users in the directory. The `user_field_ids` parameter in `DirectoryItemsController#index` accepts arbitrary user field IDs without authorization checks, bypassing the visibility restrictions (`show_on_profile` / `show_on_user_card`) that are enforced elsewhere (e.g., `UserCardSerializer` via `Guardian#allowed_user_field_ids`). An attacker can request `GET /directory_items.json?period=all&user_field_ids=<id>` with any private field ID and receive that field's value for every user in the directory response. This enables bulk exfiltration of private user data such as phone numbers, addresses, or other sensitive custom fields that admins have explicitly configured as non-public. The issue is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 by filtering `user_field_ids` against `UserField.public_fields` for non-staff users before building the custom field map. As a workaround, site administrators can remove sensitive data from private user fields, or disable the user directory via the `enable_user_directory` site setting.