Search Results (10601 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-52463 2026-04-15 N/A
Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Active! mail 6 BuildInfo: 6.60.06008562 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended E-mail may be sent when a user accesses a specially crafted URL while being logged in.
CVE-2024-4541 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The Custom Product List Table plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when modifying products. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, delete, bulk edit, approve or cancel products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-64482 1 Enalean 1 Tuleap 2026-04-15 4.6 Medium
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.13.99.1762267347 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 17.01-, 16.13-6, and 16.12-9 don't have cross-site request forgery protections in the file release system. An attacker could use this vulnerability to trick victims into changing the commit rules or immutable tags of a SVN repo. Tuleap Community Edition 16.13.99.1762267347, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 17.0-1, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.13-6, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.12-9 fix the issue.
CVE-2025-13970 1 Openplcproject 1 Openplc V3 2026-04-15 8 High
OpenPLC_V3 is vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack due to the absence of proper CSRF validation. This issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to trick a logged-in administrator into visiting a maliciously crafted link, potentially enabling unauthorized modification of PLC settings or the upload of malicious programs which could lead to significant disruption or damage to connected systems.
CVE-2024-47914 2026-04-15 4.5 Medium
VaeMendis - CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
CVE-2024-50054 1 Myscada 2 Mypro Manager, Mypro Runtime 2026-04-15 7.5 High
The back-end does not sufficiently verify the user-controlled filename parameter which makes it possible for an attacker to perform a path traversal attack and retrieve arbitrary files from the file system.
CVE-2024-41729 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Due to missing authorization checks, SAP BEx Analyzer allows an authenticated attacker to access information over the network which is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation the attacker can enumerate information causing a limited impact on confidentiality of the application.
CVE-2024-12554 2026-04-15 5.4 Medium
The Peter’s Custom Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the cas_register_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to blacklist emails via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-55500 2026-04-15 8.8 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avenwu Whistle v.2.9.90 and before allows attackers to perform malicious API calls, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code on the victim's machine.
CVE-2025-4375 2026-04-15 N/A
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pro Cloud Server allows Cross-Site Request Forgery to perform Session Hijacking. Cross-Site Request Forgery is present at the whole application but it can be used to change the Pro Cloud Server Configuration password. This issue affects Pro Cloud Server: earlier than 6.0.165.
CVE-2025-54887 1 Ruby-jwe Project 1 Ruby-jwe 2026-04-15 9.1 Critical
jwe is a Ruby implementation of the RFC 7516 JSON Web Encryption (JWE) standard. In versions 1.1.0 and below, authentication tags of encrypted JWEs can be brute forced, which may result in loss of confidentiality for those JWEs and provide ways to craft arbitrary JWEs. This puts users at risk because JWEs can be modified to decrypt to an arbitrary value, decrypted by observing parsing differences and the GCM internal GHASH key can be recovered. Users are affected by this vulnerability even if they do not use an AES-GCM encryption algorithm for their JWEs. As the GHASH key may have been leaked, users must rotate the encryption keys after upgrading. This issue is fixed in version 1.1.1.
CVE-2025-59163 1 Safedep 1 Vet 2026-04-15 N/A
vet is an open source software supply chain security tool. Versions 1.12.4 and below are vulnerable to a DNS rebinding attack due to lack of HTTP Host and Origin header validation. Data from the vet scan sqlite3 database may be exposed to remote attackers when vet is used as an MCP server in SSE mode with default ports through the sqlite3 query MCP tool. This issue is fixed in version 1.12.5.
CVE-2018-25151 1 Ecessa 1 Wanworx Wvr-30 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Ecessa WANWorx WVR-30 versions before 10.7.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to create a new superuser account by tricking an authenticated administrator into loading the page.
CVE-2025-64253 1 Wordpress 2 Health Check & Troubleshooting, Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.9 Medium
Path Traversal: '.../...//' vulnerability in WordPress.org Health Check & Troubleshooting health-check allows Path Traversal.This issue affects Health Check & Troubleshooting: from n/a through <= 1.7.1.
CVE-2025-62733 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ProteusThemes Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes custom-sidebars-by-proteusthemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes: from n/a through <= 1.0.3.
CVE-2018-25127 2026-04-15 5.3 Medium
SOCA Access Control System 180612 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit forged requests to create admin accounts by tricking logged-in users into visiting a malicious site.
CVE-2025-32086 1 Intel 3 Processors, Xeon, Xeon Processors 2026-04-15 7.2 High
Improperly implemented security check for standard in the DDRIO configuration for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 Processors when using Intel(R) SGX or Intel(R) TDX may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
CVE-2024-11417 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
The dejure.org Vernetzungsfunktion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.97.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the djo_einstellungen_menue() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-36677 2026-04-15 7.5 High
In the module "Login as customer PRO" (loginascustomerpro) <1.2.7 from Weblir for PrestaShop, a guest can access direct link to connect to each customer account of the Shop if the module is not installed OR if a secret accessible to administrator is stolen.
CVE-2024-7501 2026-04-15 4.2 Medium
The Download Plugins and Themes in ZIP from Dashboard plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the download_theme() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to download arbitrary themes from the website via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. In versions prior to 1.8.6 it was possible to download the entire sites files.