| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The response coming from TP-Link Archer MR200 v5.2, C20 v6, TL-WR850N v3, and TL-WR845N v4 for any request is getting executed by the JavaScript function like eval directly without any check. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability via a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack to execute JavaScript code on the router's admin web portal without the user's permission or knowledge. |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted page. |
| pgAdmin versions 9.11 are affected by a Restore restriction bypass via key disclosure vulnerability that occurs when running in server mode and performing restores from PLAIN-format dump files. An attacker with access to the pgAdmin web interface can observe an active restore operation, extract the `\restrict` key in real time, and race the restore process by overwriting the restore script with a payload that re-enables meta-commands using `\unrestrict <key>`. This results in reliable command execution on the pgAdmin host during the restore operation. |
| The html.Parse function in golang.org/x/net/html has an infinite parsing loop when processing certain inputs, which can lead to denial of service (DoS) if an attacker provides specially crafted HTML content. |
| An Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in TP-Link Tapo H100 v1 and Tapo P100 v1 allows an on-path attacker on the same network segment to intercept and modify encrypted device-cloud communications. This may compromise the confidentiality and integrity of device-to-cloud communication, enabling manipulation of device data or operations. |
| A truncated 802.15.4 packet can lead to an assert, resulting in a denial of service. |
| The html.Parse function in golang.org/x/net/html has quadratic parsing complexity when processing certain inputs, which can lead to denial of service (DoS) if an attacker provides specially crafted HTML content. |
| In builds with PubSub and JSON enabled, a crafted JSON message can cause the decoder to write beyond a heap-allocated array before authentication, reliably crashing the process and corrupting memory. |
| Due to improper type validation in attachment parsing the Socket.io js library, it is possible to overwrite the _placeholder object which allows an attacker to place references to functions at arbitrary places in the resulting query object. |
| There is a Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) issue in Esri ArcGIS Pro versions 3.6.0 and earlier. ArcGIS Pro is a desktop application, and exploitation is limited to local users interacting with the application; no privileged role or elevated permissions are required beyond standard local user access. A local attacker can supply malicious strings that may be rendered and executed when a specific dialog within ArcGIS Pro is opened. This issue is fixed in ArcGIS Pro version 3.6.1. |
| Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series R08PCPU, R16PCPU, R32PCPU, and R120PCPU allows an unauthenticated attacker to read device data or part of a control program from the affected product, write device data in the affected product, or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on the affected product by sending a specially crafted packet containing a specific command to the affected product. |
| There is a reflected Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 11.1 and 11.2 that may allow a remote, authenticated attacker with low‑privileged access to create a crafted link which, when clicked, could potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim’s browser. Exploitation is limited to the same browser execution context and does not result in a change of security scope beyond the affected user session. |
| A SQL injection vulnerability in ArcGIS Server allows an EDIT operation to modify column properties in a manner that could lead to SQL injection when performed by a remote authenticated user requiring elevated, non‑administrative privileges. Exploitation is restricted to users with advanced application‑specific permissions, indicating high privileges are required. Successful exploitation would have a high impact on integrity and confidentiality, with no impact on availability. |
| There is an improper access control issue in ArcGIS Server versions 11.3 and below on Windows and Linux which, under unique circumstances, could allow a remote, low‑privileged authenticated attacker to access secure services published to a standalone (unfederated) ArcGIS Server instance. Successful exploitation results in unauthorized access to protected services outside the attacker’s originally assigned authorization boundary, constituting a scope change. If exploited, this issue would have a high impact on confidentiality, a low impact on integrity, and no impact on the availability of the software. |
| There is a stored Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 11.2 and below that may allow a remote, authenticated attacker to create a crafted link that can be saved as a new location when moving an existing item, which could potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code in a victim’s browser. Exploitation does not require any privileges and can be performed by an anonymous user. |
| There is a cross‑site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS Experience Builder versions 11.1 and below on Windows and Linux that allows a remote, authenticated attacker with low‑privileged access to create a crafted link which, when clicked, could potentially execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim’s browser. Exploitation requires basic authenticated access but does not require elevated or administrative privileges, indicating low privileges are required. |
| There is a difficult‑to‑exploit improper authentication issue in the Home application for Esri Portal for ArcGIS versions 11.2 and below on Windows and Linux, and ArcGIS Enterprise versions 11.1 and below on Kubernetes, which under unique circumstances could allow a remote, authenticated attacker with low‑privileged access to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the software. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to cross an authentication and authorization boundary beyond their originally assigned access, resulting in a scope change. |
| There is a Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri ArcGIS Enterprise Sites versions 10.9 and below that may allow a remote, authenticated attacker to create a crafted link which, when clicked by a victim, could result in the execution of arbitrary JavaScript code in the target’s browser. Exploitation requires high‑privileged authenticated access. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to access sensitive session data, manipulate trusted content, and disrupt normal application functionality, resulting in a high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| There is a stored Cross‑Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS Sites versions 11.1 and below that may allow a remote, authenticated attacker with high‑privileged access to create a crafted link that is persisted within the site configuration. When accessed by a victim, the stored payload may execute arbitrary JavaScript code in the victim’s browser. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to access sensitive user data and session information, alter trusted site content and user actions, and disrupt normal site functionality, resulting in a high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| ArcGIS Server version 11.5 and earlier on Windows and Linux does not properly validate uploaded files, which allows remote attackers to upload arbitrary files. However, exploitation is constrained by server-side controls that prevent execution of uploaded content and do not allow modification of existing application files or system configurations. As a result, successful exploitation would have a low impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, and would not enable service disruption, privilege escalation, or unauthorized access to sensitive data. |
