Search

Search Results (335167 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-24452 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by supplying a crafted template file to the devices route.
CVE-2026-24498 1 Efm-networks 4 Iptime Ax2004m, Iptime Ax3000q, Iptime Ax6000m and 1 more 2026-02-27 N/A
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in EFM-Networks, Inc. IpTIME T5008, EFM-Networks, Inc. IpTIME AX2004M, EFM-Networks, Inc. IpTIME AX3000Q, EFM-Networks, Inc. IpTIME AX6000M allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects ipTIME T5008: through 15.26.8; ipTIME AX2004M: through 15.26.8; ipTIME AX3000Q: through 15.26.8; ipTIME AX6000M: through 15.26.8.
CVE-2026-24517 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the firmware update route.
CVE-2026-24663 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 9 Critical
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by sending a crafted request to the libraries installation route and injecting malicious input into the request body.
CVE-2026-24689 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the devices field of the firmware update apply action.
CVE-2026-24695 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into OpenSSL argument fields within requests sent to the utility route, leading to remote code execution.
CVE-2026-25085 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8.6 High
A vulnerability exists in Copeland XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, in which an unexpected return value from the authentication routine is later on processed as a legitimate value, resulting in an authentication bypass.
CVE-2026-25105 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into parameters of the Modbus command tool in the debug route.
CVE-2026-25109 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the devices field when accessing the get setup route, leading to remote code execution.
CVE-2026-25111 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into requests sent to the restore route.
CVE-2026-25113 1 Switch Ev 1 Swtchenergy.com 2026-02-27 7.5 High
The WebSocket Application Programming Interface lacks restrictions on the number of authentication requests. This absence of rate limiting may allow an attacker to conduct denial-of-service attacks by suppressing or mis-routing legitimate charger telemetry, or conduct brute-force attacks to gain unauthorized access.
CVE-2026-25195 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by supplying a crafted firmware update file via the firmware update route.
CVE-2026-25196 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the Wi-Fi SSID and/or password fields can lead to remote code execution when the configuration is processed.
CVE-2026-25711 1 Chargemap 1 Chargemap.com 2026-02-27 7.3 High
The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests.
CVE-2026-25721 1 Copeland 3 Copeland Xweb 300d Pro, Copeland Xweb 500b Pro, Copeland Xweb 500d Pro 2026-02-27 8 High
An OS command injection vulnerability exists in XWEB Pro version 1.12.1 and prior, enabling an authenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution on the system by injecting malicious input into the server username and/or password fields of the restore action in the API V1 route.
CVE-2026-25741 1 Zulip 1 Zulip 2026-02-27 7.1 High
Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. Prior to commit bf28c82dc9b1f630fa8e9106358771b20a0040f7, the API endpoint for creating a card update session during an upgrade flow was accessible to users with only organization member privileges. When the associated Stripe Checkout session is completed, the Stripe webhook updates the organization’s default payment method. Because no billing-specific authorization check is enforced, a regular (non-billing) member can change the organization’s payment method. This vulnerability affected the Zulip Cloud payment processing system, and has been patched as of commit bf28c82dc9b1f630fa8e9106358771b20a0040f7. Self-hosted deploys are no longer affected and no patch or upgrade is required for them.
CVE-2026-25778 1 Switch Ev 1 Swtchenergy.com 2026-02-27 7.3 High
The WebSocket backend uses charging station identifiers to uniquely associate sessions but allows multiple endpoints to connect using the same session identifier. This implementation results in predictable session identifiers and enables session hijacking or shadowing, where the most recent connection displaces the legitimate charging station and receives backend commands intended for that station. This vulnerability may allow unauthorized users to authenticate as other users or enable a malicious actor to cause a denial-of-service condition by overwhelming the backend with valid session requests.
CVE-2026-2597 1 Leont 1 Crypt::sysrandom::xs 2026-02-27 N/A
Crypt::SysRandom::XS versions before 0.010 for Perl is vulnerable to a heap buffer overflow in the XS function random_bytes(). The function does not validate that the length parameter is non-negative. If a negative value (e.g. -1) is supplied, the expression length + 1u causes an integer wraparound, resulting in a zero-byte allocation. The subsequent call to chosen random function (e.g. getrandom) passes the original negative value, which is implicitly converted to a large unsigned value (typically SIZE_MAX). This can result in writes beyond the allocated buffer, leading to heap memory corruption and application crash (denial of service). In common usage, the length argument is typically hardcoded by the caller, which reduces the likelihood of attacker-controlled exploitation. Applications that pass untrusted input to this parameter may be affected.
CVE-2026-26077 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-02-27 6.5 Medium
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, several webhook endpoints (SendGrid, Mailjet, Mandrill, Postmark, SparkPost) in the `WebhooksController` accepted requests without a valid authentication token when no token was configured. This allowed unauthenticated attackers to forge webhook payloads and artificially inflate user bounce scores, potentially causing legitimate user emails to be disabled. The Mailpace endpoint had no token validation at all. Starting in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, all webhook endpoints reject requests with a 406 response when no authentication token is configured. As a workaround, ensure that webhook authentication tokens are configured for all email provider integrations in site settings (e.g., `sendgrid_verification_key`, `mailjet_webhook_token`, `postmark_webhook_token`, `sparkpost_webhook_token`). There's no current workaround for mailpace before getting this fix.
CVE-2026-26078 1 Discourse 1 Discourse 2026-02-27 7.5 High
Discourse is an open source discussion platform. Prior to versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0, when the `patreon_webhook_secret` site setting is blank, an attacker can forge valid webhook signatures by computing an HMAC-MD5 with an empty string as the key. Since the request body is known to the sender, the attacker can produce a matching signature and send arbitrary webhook payloads. This allows unauthorized creation, modification, or deletion of Patreon pledge data and triggering patron-to-group synchronization. This vulnerability is patched in versions 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0. The fix rejects webhook requests when the webhook secret is not configured, preventing signature forgery with an empty key. As a workaround, configure the `patreon_webhook_secret` site setting with a strong, non-empty secret value. When the secret is non-empty, an attacker cannot forge valid signatures without knowing the secret.