| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One management console could allow a remote attacker to upload malicious code and execute commands on affected installations.
Please note: although this vulnerability carries a technical critical CVSS rating, this was reported via responsible disclosure via a researcher through the Zero Day Initiative. The SaaS versions of the product have already been mitigated and no customer action required.
For this particular vulnerability, an attacker must have access to the Trend Micro Apex One Management Console, so customers that have their console�s IP address exposed externally should consider mitigating factors such as source restrictions if not already applied. |
| A vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One management console could allow a remote attacker to upload malicious code and execute commands on affected installations. This vulnerability is similar in scope to CVE-2025-71210 but affects a different executable.
Please note: although this vulnerability carries a technical critical CVSS rating, this was reported via responsible disclosure via a researcher through the Zero Day Initiative. The SaaS versions of the product have already been mitigated and no customer action required.
For this particular vulnerability, an attacker must have access to the Trend Micro Apex One Management Console, so customers that have their console�s IP address exposed externally should consider mitigating factors such as source restrictions if not already applied. |
| An origin validation vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. This is similar to CVE-2026-34927 but exists in a different named pipe communication mechanism.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| An origin validation vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. This is similar to CVE-2026-45206 but exists in a different process protection communication mechanism.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| An origin validation vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. This is similar to CVE-2026-34927 but exists in a different process protection mechanism.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| An origin validation vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. This is similar to CVE-2026-34927 but exists in a different inter-process communication mechanism.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| A time-of-check time-of-use vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| An origin validation error vulnerability in Trend Micro Apex One could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| An origin validation vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations. This is similar to CVE-2026-45207 but exists in a different process protection communication mechanism.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net/mlx5: Fix deadlock between devlink lock and esw->wq
esw->work_queue executes esw_functions_changed_event_handler ->
esw_vfs_changed_event_handler and acquires the devlink lock.
.eswitch_mode_set (acquires devlink lock in devlink_nl_pre_doit) ->
mlx5_devlink_eswitch_mode_set -> mlx5_eswitch_disable_locked ->
mlx5_eswitch_event_handler_unregister -> flush_workqueue deadlocks
when esw_vfs_changed_event_handler executes.
Fix that by no longer flushing the work to avoid the deadlock, and using
a generation counter to keep track of work relevance. This avoids an old
handler manipulating an esw that has undergone one or more mode changes:
- the counter is incremented in mlx5_eswitch_event_handler_unregister.
- the counter is read and passed to the ephemeral mlx5_host_work struct.
- the work handler takes the devlink lock and bails out if the current
generation is different than the one it was scheduled to operate on.
- mlx5_eswitch_cleanup does the final draining before destroying the wq.
No longer flushing the workqueue has the side effect of maybe no longer
cancelling pending vport_change_handler work items, but that's ok since
those are disabled elsewhere:
- mlx5_eswitch_disable_locked disables the vport eq notifier.
- mlx5_esw_vport_disable disarms the HW EQ notification and marks
vport->enabled under state_lock to false to prevent pending vport
handler from doing anything.
- mlx5_eswitch_cleanup destroys the workqueue and makes sure all events
are disabled/finished. |
| Insufficient Validation of Names During AXFR |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
unshare: fix unshare_fs() handling
There's an unpleasant corner case in unshare(2), when we have a
CLONE_NEWNS in flags and current->fs hadn't been shared at all; in that
case copy_mnt_ns() gets passed current->fs instead of a private copy,
which causes interesting warts in proof of correctness]
> I guess if private means fs->users == 1, the condition could still be true.
Unfortunately, it's worse than just a convoluted proof of correctness.
Consider the case when we have CLONE_NEWCGROUP in addition to CLONE_NEWNS
(and current->fs->users == 1).
We pass current->fs to copy_mnt_ns(), all right. Suppose it succeeds and
flips current->fs->{pwd,root} to corresponding locations in the new namespace.
Now we proceed to copy_cgroup_ns(), which fails (e.g. with -ENOMEM).
We call put_mnt_ns() on the namespace created by copy_mnt_ns(), it's
destroyed and its mount tree is dissolved, but... current->fs->root and
current->fs->pwd are both left pointing to now detached mounts.
They are pinning those, so it's not a UAF, but it leaves the calling
process with unshare(2) failing with -ENOMEM _and_ leaving it with
pwd and root on detached isolated mounts. The last part is clearly a bug.
There is other fun related to that mess (races with pivot_root(), including
the one between pivot_root() and fork(), of all things), but this one
is easy to isolate and fix - treat CLONE_NEWNS as "allocate a new
fs_struct even if it hadn't been shared in the first place". Sure, we could
go for something like "if both CLONE_NEWNS *and* one of the things that might
end up failing after copy_mnt_ns() call in create_new_namespaces() are set,
force allocation of new fs_struct", but let's keep it simple - the cost
of copy_fs_struct() is trivial.
Another benefit is that copy_mnt_ns() with CLONE_NEWNS *always* gets
a freshly allocated fs_struct, yet to be attached to anything. That
seriously simplifies the analysis...
FWIW, that bug had been there since the introduction of unshare(2) ;-/ |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
fs: init flags_valid before calling vfs_fileattr_get
syzbot reported a uninit-value bug in [1].
Similar to the "*get" context where the kernel's internal file_kattr
structure is initialized before calling vfs_fileattr_get(), we should
use the same mechanism when using fa.
[1]
BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in fuse_fileattr_get+0xeb4/0x1450 fs/fuse/ioctl.c:517
fuse_fileattr_get+0xeb4/0x1450 fs/fuse/ioctl.c:517
vfs_fileattr_get fs/file_attr.c:94 [inline]
__do_sys_file_getattr fs/file_attr.c:416 [inline]
Local variable fa.i created at:
__do_sys_file_getattr fs/file_attr.c:380 [inline]
__se_sys_file_getattr+0x8c/0xbd0 fs/file_attr.c:372 |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: storvsc: Fix scheduling while atomic on PREEMPT_RT
This resolves the follow splat and lock-up when running with PREEMPT_RT
enabled on Hyper-V:
[ 415.140818] BUG: scheduling while atomic: stress-ng-iomix/1048/0x00000002
[ 415.140822] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 415.140823] Modules linked in: intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common intel_uncore_frequency_common intel_pmc_core pmt_telemetry pmt_discovery pmt_class intel_pmc_ssram_telemetry intel_vsec ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel rapl binfmt_misc nls_ascii nls_cp437 vfat fat snd_pcm hyperv_drm snd_timer drm_client_lib drm_shmem_helper snd sg soundcore drm_kms_helper pcspkr hv_balloon hv_utils evdev joydev drm configfs efi_pstore nfnetlink vsock_loopback vmw_vsock_virtio_transport_common hv_sock vmw_vsock_vmci_transport vsock vmw_vmci efivarfs autofs4 ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod sd_mod cdrom hv_storvsc serio_raw hid_generic scsi_transport_fc hid_hyperv scsi_mod hid hv_netvsc hyperv_keyboard scsi_common
[ 415.140846] Preemption disabled at:
[ 415.140847] [<ffffffffc0656171>] storvsc_queuecommand+0x2e1/0xbe0 [hv_storvsc]
[ 415.140854] CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 1048 Comm: stress-ng-iomix Not tainted 6.19.0-rc7 #30 PREEMPT_{RT,(full)}
[ 415.140856] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 09/04/2024
[ 415.140857] Call Trace:
[ 415.140861] <TASK>
[ 415.140861] ? storvsc_queuecommand+0x2e1/0xbe0 [hv_storvsc]
[ 415.140863] dump_stack_lvl+0x91/0xb0
[ 415.140870] __schedule_bug+0x9c/0xc0
[ 415.140875] __schedule+0xdf6/0x1300
[ 415.140877] ? rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x56c/0x1980
[ 415.140879] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.140883] schedule_rtlock+0x21/0x40
[ 415.140885] rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x502/0x1980
[ 415.140891] rt_spin_lock+0x89/0x1e0
[ 415.140893] hv_ringbuffer_write+0x87/0x2a0
[ 415.140899] vmbus_sendpacket_mpb_desc+0xb6/0xe0
[ 415.140900] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.140902] storvsc_queuecommand+0x669/0xbe0 [hv_storvsc]
[ 415.140904] ? HARDIRQ_verbose+0x10/0x10
[ 415.140908] ? __rq_qos_issue+0x28/0x40
[ 415.140911] scsi_queue_rq+0x760/0xd80 [scsi_mod]
[ 415.140926] __blk_mq_issue_directly+0x4a/0xc0
[ 415.140928] blk_mq_issue_direct+0x87/0x2b0
[ 415.140931] blk_mq_dispatch_queue_requests+0x120/0x440
[ 415.140933] blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0x7a/0x1a0
[ 415.140935] __blk_flush_plug+0xf4/0x150
[ 415.140940] __submit_bio+0x2b2/0x5c0
[ 415.140944] ? submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x272/0x360
[ 415.140946] submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x272/0x360
[ 415.140951] ext4_read_bh_lock+0x3e/0x60 [ext4]
[ 415.140995] ext4_block_write_begin+0x396/0x650 [ext4]
[ 415.141018] ? __pfx_ext4_da_get_block_prep+0x10/0x10 [ext4]
[ 415.141038] ext4_da_write_begin+0x1c4/0x350 [ext4]
[ 415.141060] generic_perform_write+0x14e/0x2c0
[ 415.141065] ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x6b/0x120 [ext4]
[ 415.141083] vfs_write+0x2ca/0x570
[ 415.141087] ksys_write+0x76/0xf0
[ 415.141089] do_syscall_64+0x99/0x1490
[ 415.141093] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.141095] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xdf/0x3d0
[ 415.141097] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.141098] ? lock_release+0x1f0/0x2a0
[ 415.141100] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.141101] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xe4/0x3d0
[ 415.141103] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.141104] ? __schedule+0xb34/0x1300
[ 415.141106] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x1d/0x170
[ 415.141109] ? do_nanosleep+0x8b/0x160
[ 415.141111] ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0x89/0x100
[ 415.141114] ? __pfx_hrtimer_wakeup+0x10/0x10
[ 415.141116] ? xfd_validate_state+0x26/0x90
[ 415.141118] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.141120] ? do_syscall_64+0x1e0/0x1490
[ 415.141121] ? do_syscall_64+0x1e0/0x1490
[ 415.141123] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
[ 415.141124] ? do_syscall_64+0x1e0/0x1490
[ 415.141125] ? do_syscall_64+0x1e0/0x1490
[ 415.141127] ? irqentry_exit+0x140/0
---truncated--- |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
xprtrdma: Decrement re_receiving on the early exit paths
In the event that rpcrdma_post_recvs() fails to create a work request
(due to memory allocation failure, say) or otherwise exits early, we
should decrement ep->re_receiving before returning. Otherwise we will
hang in rpcrdma_xprt_drain() as re_receiving will never reach zero and
the completion will never be triggered.
On a system with high memory pressure, this can appear as the following
hung task:
INFO: task kworker/u385:17:8393 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
Tainted: G S E 6.19.0 #3
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
task:kworker/u385:17 state:D stack:0 pid:8393 tgid:8393 ppid:2 task_flags:0x4248060 flags:0x00080000
Workqueue: xprtiod xprt_autoclose [sunrpc]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x48b/0x18b0
? ib_post_send_mad+0x247/0xae0 [ib_core]
schedule+0x27/0xf0
schedule_timeout+0x104/0x110
__wait_for_common+0x98/0x180
? __pfx_schedule_timeout+0x10/0x10
wait_for_completion+0x24/0x40
rpcrdma_xprt_disconnect+0x444/0x460 [rpcrdma]
xprt_rdma_close+0x12/0x40 [rpcrdma]
xprt_autoclose+0x5f/0x120 [sunrpc]
process_one_work+0x191/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x2e3/0x420
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x10d/0x230
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x273/0x2b0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 |
| A link following vulnerability in the Trend Micro Apex One scan engine could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| An origin validation vulnerability in the Apex One/SEP agent could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges on affected installations.
Please note: an attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. |
| NetBox versions 4.3.5 through 4.5.4 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the RenderTemplateMixin.get_environment_params() method that allows authenticated users with exporttemplate or configtemplate permissions to execute arbitrary code by specifying malicious Python callables in the environment_params field. Attackers can bypass Jinja2 SandboxedEnvironment protections by setting the finalize parameter to any importable Python callable such as subprocess.getoutput, which is invoked on every rendered expression outside the sandbox's call interception mechanism, achieving remote code execution as the NetBox service user. |
| TeleJSON prior to 6.0.0 contains a DOM-based cross-site scripting vulnerability in the parse() function that allows attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript by delivering a crafted JSON payload containing a malicious _constructor-name_ property value. The custom reviver passes the constructor name directly to new Function() without sanitization when recreating object prototypes, enabling attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript through vectors such as postMessage in cross-frame communication contexts to achieve script execution within the application. |
| Taiko AG1000-01A SMS Alert Gateway Rev 7.3 and Rev 8 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the embedded web configuration interface that allows authenticated attackers to execute persistent JavaScript by fragmenting malicious payloads across multiple administrative form fields. Attackers can bypass front-end length restrictions using JavaScript comments and template literals to concatenate executable script fragments that are rendered in administrative dashboard views such as index.zhtml, resulting in persistent script execution within administrative sessions. |
