| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Geovision GV-ASWeb application with the version 6.1.1.0 or less that allows attackers to arbitrarily create Administrator accounts via a crafted GET request method. This vulnerability is used in chain with CVE-2024-56903 for a successful CSRF attack. |
| The Simple Sitemap – Create a Responsive HTML Sitemap plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.13. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the 'admin_notices' hook found in class-settings.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin options to a default state via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| SAP Asset Accounting could allow a high privileged attacker to exploit insufficient validation of path information provided by the users and pass it through to the file API's. Thus, causing a considerable impact on confidentiality, integrity and availability of the application.
|
| Versions of Gliffy Online prior to versions 4.14.0-7 contains a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) flaw. |
| Beward N100 H.264 VGA IP Camera M2.1.6 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a hidden form to add an admin user by tricking a logged-in user into submitting the form. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ProteusThemes Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes custom-sidebars-by-proteusthemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes: from n/a through <= 1.0.3. |
| Overview
The product uses external input to construct a pathname that should be within a restricted directory, but it does not properly neutralize '.../...//' (doubled triple dot slash) sequences that can resolve to a location that is outside of that directory. (CWE-35)
Description
Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration & Analytics versions before 10.2.0.2, including 9.3.x and 8.3.x, do not sanitize a user input used as a file path through the UploadFile service.
Impact
This allows attackers to traverse the file system to access files or directories that are outside of the restricted directory. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in JumpDEMAND Inc. ActiveDEMAND.This issue affects ActiveDEMAND: from n/a through 0.2.43. |
| In the module "Login as customer PRO" (loginascustomerpro) <1.2.7 from Weblir for PrestaShop, a guest can access direct link to connect to each customer account of the Shop if the module is not installed OR if a secret accessible to administrator is stolen. |
| The WP-ViperGB plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when saving plugin settings. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." |
| A vulnerability was discovered in the firmware builds up to 8.2.1.0820 in certain Poly devices. The firmware flaw does not properly prevent path traversal and could lead to information disclosure. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'pvmsg.php?action=add_message', pvmsg.php?action=confirm_delete , and ajax.server.php?page=user&action=flip_follow endpoints in Ampache <= 6.6.0. |
| The Hoppscotch Browser Extension is a browser extension for Hoppscotch, a community-driven end-to-end open-source API development ecosystem. Due to an oversight during a change made to the extension in the commit d4e8e4830326f46ba17acd1307977ecd32a85b58, a critical check for the origin list was missed and allowed for messages to be sent to the extension which the extension gladly processed and responded back with the results of, while this wasn't supposed to happen and be blocked by the origin not being present in the origin list.
This vulnerability exposes Hoppscotch Extension users to sites which call into Hoppscotch Extension APIs internally. This fundamentally allows any site running on the browser with the extension installed to bypass CORS restrictions if the user is running extensions with the given version. This security hole was patched in the commit 7e364b928ab722dc682d0fcad713a96cc38477d6 which was released along with the extension version `0.35`. As a workaround, Chrome users can use the Extensions Settings to disable the extension access to only the origins that you want. Firefox doesn't have an alternative to upgrading to a fixed version. |
| The Appsero Helper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'appsero_helper' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| An issue in Foundation.app Foundation platform 1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Web3 authentication process of Foundation, the signed message lacks a nonce (random number) |
| An issue was discovered on Epson Expression Home XP255 20.08.FM10I8 devices. POST requests don't require (anti-)CSRF tokens or other mechanisms for validating that the request is from a legitimate source. In addition, CSRF attacks can be used to send text directly to the RAW printer interface. For example, an attack could deliver a worrisome printout to an end user. |
| The Webcamconsult plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FanBridge FanBridge signup fanbridge-signup allows Stored XSS.This issue affects FanBridge signup: from n/a through <= 0.6. |
| The ThePerfectWedding.nl Widget plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'update_option' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the 'tpwKey' option with stored cross-site scripting via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
