| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The originally reported issue in https://github.com/syedsohaibkarim/OpenRedirect-Keycloak18.0.0 is a known misconfiguration, and recommendation already exists in the Keycloak documentation to mitigate the issue: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_admin/index.html#open-redirectors. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2023-51478. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2023-51478. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2023-51478 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The maintainer identified an error in the libyaml fuzzers. It is not possible to reproduce nor exploit the issue. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that there was not reasonable evidence to determine the existence of a vulnerability. |