| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-5079. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-5079. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-5079 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2005-3265. Reason: this candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2005-3265; after initial reservation, the requester discovered that they had the same cause. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2005-3265 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6120. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6120. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6120 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2014-6271. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2014-6271. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2014-6271 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4670, CVE-2010-4671. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4670 and CVE-2010-4671. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4670 and/or CVE-2010-4671 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: A public posting on 20130831 referenced this ID for a specific issue, but that issue had not been assigned this ID by any CNA. Notes: The posting will later have IDs assigned in accordance with CVE content decisions |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-3528. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-3528. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-3528 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3608. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was used as an example and was not assigned for a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1636. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2013-1636. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1636 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2587. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2587. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2587 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2013-1664, CVE-2013-1665. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2013-1664 and/or CVE-2013-1665 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. It was a duplicate assignment before public disclosure. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-5372. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-5372. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-5372 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage |