| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A transient execution vulnerability in some AMD processors may allow a user process to infer TSC_AUX even when such a read is disabled, potentially resulting in information leakage. |
| Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an
empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to
be sent to the peer.
Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences
such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue
could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent
to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications
that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of
supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never
be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by
accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling
application.
The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS
applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN
(Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and
is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more
widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of
protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns
the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the
client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the
first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap
between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is
called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and
returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports
that there was no overlap in the lists).
This function is typically called from a server side application callback for
ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list
of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in
length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never
normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the
SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list
supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the
application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has
accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has
accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len
parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap"
response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it
will be vulnerable to this problem.
In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select
a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol
in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes
from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length.
However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a
client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the
application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of
confidentiality will occur.
This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most
likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not
widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error.
Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active
exploitation unlikely.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of
OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they
become available. |
| An XML External Entity (XXE) injection vulnerability in Intersec Geosafe-ea 2022.12, 2022.13, and 2022.14 allows attackers to perform arbitrary file reading under the privileges of the running process, make SSRF requests, or cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via unspecified vectors. |
| SUBNET Solutions Inc. has identified vulnerabilities in third-party
components used in PowerSYSTEM Server 2021 and Substation Server 2021. |
| There is a potential OOB Write vulnerability in the gen_prov_start function in pb_adv.c. The full length of the received data is copied into the link.rx.buf receiver buffer without any validation on the data size. |
| An out-of-bound write can lead to an arbitrary code execution. Even on devices with some form of memory protection, this can still lead to a crash and a resultant denial of service. |
| Prime95 version 29.8 build 6 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in the user ID input field that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. Attackers can craft a malicious payload and paste it into the PrimeNet user ID and proxy host fields to trigger a bind shell on port 3110. |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in CSAPP_Lab CSAPP Lab3 15-213 Fall 20xx allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the lab3 of csapp,lab3/buflab-update.pl component. |
| A stack overflow vulnerability was found in version 1.18.0 of rhai. The flaw position is: (/ SRC/rhai/SRC/eval/STMT. Rs in rhai: : eval: : STMT: : _ $LT $impl $u20 $rhai.. engine.. Engine$GT$::eval_stmt::h3f1d68ce37fc6e96). Due to the stack overflow is a recursive call/SRC/rhai/SRC/eval/STMT. Rs file eval_stmt_block function. |
| Buffer overflow vulnerability in Immunity Debugger affecting version 1.85, its exploitation could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code, due to the lack of proper boundary checking. |
| Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Samsung Open Source Escargot JavaScript engine allows Overflow Buffers.This issue affects Escargot: 4.0.0. |
| Open Networking Foundation SD-RAN ONOS onos-lib-go 0.10.28 allows an index out-of-range panic in asn1/aper GetBitString via a zero value of numBits. |
| Wiki.js is al wiki app built on Node.js. Client side template injection was discovered, that could allow an attacker to inject malicious JavaScript into the content section of pages that would execute once a victim loads the page that contains the payload. This was possible through the injection of a invalid HTML tag with a template injection payload on the next line. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.5.303.
|
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in host-host NEUQ_board v.1.0 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the password.h component. |
| IO-1020 Micro ELD uses a default WIFI password that could allow an adjacent attacker to connect to the device.
|
| A token is created using the username, current date/time, and a fixed
AES-128 encryption key, which is the same across all installations. |
| iSmartViewPro 1.3.34 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by overflowing the camera ID input field. Attackers can paste a 257-character buffer into the camera DID and password fields to trigger an application crash on iOS devices. |
| Foscam Video Management System 1.1.4.9 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the username input field that allows attackers to crash the application. Attackers can overwrite the username with a 520-byte buffer of repeated 'A' characters to trigger an application crash during device login. |
| The <redacted>.so library, which is used by <redacted>, is
vulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion
of certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a
long file path to the <redacted> action of the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or
to the <redacted>.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this
file path to <redacted>, which is then
read by <redacted>.so
This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701.
Likelihood: Moderate – An attacker will have to find this exploit by
either obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial
and error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege)
account to gain access to the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or <redacted>.sh
script to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access
send an HTTP request that triggers it.
Impact: High – The <redacted> process, which we assume is
responsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after
performing the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow
causes the process to segfault before
<redacted> is removed. This means that,
even though <redacted> is automatically restarted, it will crash
again as soon as it tries to parse the text file.
CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I). |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in Mupen64Plus up to 2.6.0. The affected element is the function write_is_viewer of the file src/device/cart/is_viewer.c. The manipulation leads to integer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 3984137fc0c44110f1ef876adb008885b05a6e18. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. |
