| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the latest version of vanna-ai/vanna when using DuckDB as the database. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by submitting crafted SQL queries that leverage DuckDB's default features, such as `read_csv`, `read_csv_auto`, `read_text`, and `read_blob`, to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources. This can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive data, internal systems, and potentially further attacks. |
| Oxide control plane software before 5 allows SSRF. |
| An issue in Senayan Library Management System (SLiMS) 9 Bulian v.9.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the scrap_image.php component and the imageURL parameter |
| An issue in Open-Source Technology Committee SRS real-time video server RS/4.0.268(Leo) and SRS/4.0.195(Leo) allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted request. |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) was discovered in the Akana API Platform in versions prior to and including 2022.1.3. Reported by Jakob Antonsson. |
| The Ninja Forms Webhooks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.7 via the form webhook functionality. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| The Photo Gallery Slideshow & Masonry Tiled Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.15 via the rjg_get_youtube_info_justified_gallery_callback function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to retrieve limited information from internal services. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the SonicOS SSH management interface allows a remote attacker to establish a TCP connection to an IP address on any port when the user is logged in to the firewall. |
| The Auto Featured Image (Auto Post Thumbnail) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.7 via the upload_to_library AJAX action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| A server-side request forgery vulnerability exists in multiple firmware versions of AVTECH DVR devices that exposes the /cgi-bin/nobody/Search.cgi?action=cgi_query endpoint without authentication. An attacker can manipulate the ip, port, and queryb64str parameters to make arbitrary HTTP requests from the DVR to internal or external systems, potentially exposing sensitive data or interacting with internal services. |
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability in Huly Platform v0.6.295 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via uploading a crafted HTML file into chat group. |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists n multiple versions of Nimesa Backup and Recovery, If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended requests may be sent to internal servers. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery in URL Mapper in Arctic Security's Arctic Hub versions 3.0.1764-5.6.1877 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to exfiltrate and modify configurations and data. |
| SOOP-CLM developed by PiExtract has a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability, allowing privileged remote attackers to read server files or probe internal network information. |
| Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in hcengineering Huly Platform v.0.6.202 allows attackers to run arbitrary code via upload of crafted SVG file. |
| The ZD YouTube FLV Player plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2.6 via the $_GET['image'] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| The Skitter Slideshow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.2 via the /image.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| SAP BI Platform allows an attacker to modify the IP address of the LogonToken for the OpenDoc. On accessing the modified link in the browser a different server could get the ping request. This has low impact on integrity with no impact on confidentiality and availability of the system. |
| Multiple Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities were identified in the significant-gravitas/autogpt repository, specifically in the GitHub Integration and Web Search blocks. These vulnerabilities affect version agpt-platform-beta-v0.1.1. The issues arise when block inputs are controlled by untrusted sources, leading to potential credential leakage, internal network scanning, and unauthorized access to internal services, APIs, or data stores. The affected blocks include GithubListPullRequestsBlock, GithubReadPullRequestBlock, GithubAssignPRReviewerBlock, GithubListPRReviewersBlock, GithubUnassignPRReviewerBlock, GithubCommentBlock, GithubMakeIssueBlock, GithubReadIssueBlock, GithubListIssuesBlock, GithubAddLabelBlock, GithubRemoveLabelBlock, GithubListBranchesBlock, and ExtractWebsiteContentBlock. |
| LobeChat is an open source chat application platform. The web-crawler package in LobeChat version 1.136.1 allows server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the tools.search.crawlPages tRPC endpoint. A client can supply an arbitrary urls array together with impls containing the value naive. The service passes the user URLs to Crawler.crawl and the naive implementation performs a server-side fetch of each supplied URL without validating or restricting internal network addresses (such as localhost, 127.0.0.1, private IP ranges, or cloud instance metadata endpoints). This allows an attacker with a valid user token (or in development mode using a bypass header) to make the server disclose responses from internal HTTP services, potentially exposing internal API data or cloud metadata credentials. Version 1.136.2 fixes the issue. Update to version 1.136.2. No known workarounds exist. |
