| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A bypass to the admin‑only restriction of the XML‑RPC API in Revive Adserver 6.0.7. The API response for the ox.login method returned a session ID cookie in the HTTP headers, and although the method correctly returned an error, the associated session was not invalidated. As a result, the leaked session ID could be used to perform subsequent API calls without restrictions. |
| A bypass for CVE‑2026‑34913 exists with proper ownership validation that had not been applied to the reverse operation of linking campaigns and trackers through the `tracker-campaigns.php` script in Revive Adserver 6.0.7 and earlier. As a result, a low‑privileged user could link their trackers to campaigns owned by other managers on the same instance, leading to inconsistent ownership relationships. |
| An issue in Boyleep K11, y108 firmware v.2.3.0.11291 allows a physically proximate attacker to execute arbitrary code via the factory test feature. |
| An issue in SNMP4J-Agent 3.8.3 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the snmp4jCfgStoragePath component. |
| Incorrect access control in the /{form}/webhooks/{webhook} endpoint of Deck9 Input v2.0.1 allows authenticated attackers to arbitrarily modify or delete another tenant's webhook via a crafted request. |
| Incorrect access control in statping-ng v0.93.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges to Administrator and access sensitive components. |
| Incorrect access control in the webhook management component of Project Firefly III v6.5.9 allows attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted POST request. |
| In Citrix Cloud through 2025-11-10, an account with read-only access can trigger the beginning of a workflow for write operations, e.g., the system will send a one-time password to an attacker-controlled email address when the attacker attempts to reset the password of a user account. |
| Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) prior to 5.1.0.1, contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. |
| Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) prior to 5.1.0.1, contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges and Unauthorized access. |
| Dell PowerFlex Manager, version(s) prior to 5.1.0.1, contain(s) an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service. |
| Vulnerability in the WebCenter Content: Imaging product of Oracle Fusion Middleware (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.0.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise WebCenter Content: Imaging. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all WebCenter Content: Imaging accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all WebCenter Content: Imaging accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 9.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N). |
| Improper Access Control vulnerability in Themeisle PPOM for WooCommerce allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.
This issue affects PPOM for WooCommerce: from n/a through 33.0.18. |
| Dell Display and Peripheral Manager (DDPM Windows), versions prior to 2.3, contain an Improper Access Control vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution. |
| motionEye (mEye) is an online interface for motion software, which is a video surveillance program with motion detection. Versions prior to 0.44.0 are vulnerable to path traversal in the picture and movie API endpoints, suhc as /picture/{id}/preview/{filename}. Neither the API handlers, nor the mediafiles.py functions such as get_media_preview() check for .. sequences in the filename parameter, except for get_media_content(). This allows an authenticated user with normal (non-admin) privileges to read arbitrary files from the filesystem as the motionEye process user, such as: /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, motionEye config files containing password hashes and plaintext passwords, SSH keys, and other cameras' surveillance footage. This issue has been fixed in version 0.44.0. |
| FOSSBilling is a free, open-source billing and client management system. In versions 0.7.2 and prior, the Servicecustom Client API's __call method accepts an order_id parameter and fetches the associated order without verifying the authenticated client owns it, potentially exposing cross-client data through IDOR. An authenticated client can access any other client's custom service by guessing sequential order IDs. This can lead to a confidentiality breach — attackers can read client PII (name, email, phone, address, company details, VAT number) and service configuration data belonging to other clients. This issue has been fixed in version 0.8.0. |
| The Masteriyo LMS WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not perform authorization checks in a course-progress REST API controller, allowing unauthenticated users to read and permanently delete any user's course-progress records. |
| Gogs is an open source self-hosted Git service. Prior to 0.14.3, Git smart HTTP authorizes POST …/git-receive-pack using the client-supplied service query string (so ?service=git-upload-pack is evaluated as read access) while routing still runs git receive-pack, allowing push where only read should be allowed. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.14.3. |
| Capgo before 12.128.2 allows direct patching of public.apps.owner_org through PostgREST, bypassing the transfer_app() workflow and creating split-brain ownership. Attackers can directly update apps.owner_org while leaving app_versions.owner_org unchanged, enabling old-org keys to retain access to version data while new-org keys control the app record. |
| When a provide-xfr is given with a tls-auth-name, a secondary requesting a transfer should provide a client certificate with that name. However, no client certificate is needed when the request comes in over TLS over the regular tls-port (and not the tls-auth-port) or over over TCP over the regular port, when the other conditions of the provide-xfr rule match. |
