Search Results (3948 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-15562 1 Redhat 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jbosseapxp 2026-08-11 7.5 High
A flaw was found in EAP's jboss-remoting. A remote unauthenticated attacker who can reach :8080 (or :9990, or :4447) and complete an Upgrade: jboss-remoting handshake can cause OOM errors that degrade requests server-wide, leading to denial of service.
CVE-2026-59088 1 Redhat 1 Enterprise Linux 2026-08-11 5.5 Medium
A flaw was found in GIMP. A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the `file-fli` plugin when processing FLI image files. This occurs due to an incorrect calculation during memory allocation for image buffers, where the multiplication of image width and height can exceed the maximum integer value. A remote attacker could exploit this by tricking a user into opening a specially crafted FLI file, leading to the application crashing and resulting in a denial of service.
CVE-2026-68270 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-10 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/sysfb: Avoid possible truncation with calculating visible size Calculating the visible size of the system framebuffer can result in truncation of the result. The calculation uses 32-bit arithmetics, which can overflow if the values for height and stride are large. Fix the issue by multiplying with mul_u32_u32().
CVE-2026-68315 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-10 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: validate stream count in sctp_process_strreset_inreq() When processing a RESET_IN_REQUEST from a peer, sctp_process_strreset_inreq() derives the stream count from the parameter length but does not check whether the resulting RESET_OUT_REQUEST would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. The OUT request header (sctp_strreset_outreq, 16 bytes) is 8 bytes larger than the IN request header (sctp_strreset_inreq, 8 bytes). Generally, the IP payload is bounded to 65535 bytes, so the stream list cannot be large enough to trigger the overflow. However, on interfaces with MTU > 65535 (e.g., loopback with IPv6 jumbograms), a stream list that fits within the incoming IN parameter can cause a __u16 overflow in sctp_make_strreset_req() when computing the OUT request size, leading to an undersized skb allocation and a kernel BUG: net/core/skbuff.c:207 skb_panic net/core/skbuff.c:2625 skb_put net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:1535 sctp_addto_chunk net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c:3695 sctp_make_strreset_req net/sctp/stream.c:655 sctp_process_strreset_inreq The local setsockopt path validates the generated reset request size. However, for an incoming-only reset, it accounts for the smaller IN request even though the peer must generate an OUT request with the same stream list. Such a request cannot be completed successfully by the peer. Reject peer IN requests whose corresponding OUT request would exceed SCTP_MAX_CHUNK_LEN. Also tighten the local check so it does not send an IN request that would require an oversized OUT request from the peer.
CVE-2026-19389 1 Redhat 1 Enterprise Linux 2026-08-10 7.1 High
Multiple integer overflow and underflow vulnerabilities were found in the GStreamer gst-plugins-ugly ASF demuxer (asfdemux) when parsing header objects from crafted ASF, WMV, or WMA files. Insufficient validation of attacker-controlled length and size values can bypass bounds checks and cause out-of-bounds heap reads. This can result in application crash, denial of service, or limited information disclosure when untrusted media is processed.
CVE-2026-68326 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-10 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: mwifiex: bound uAP association event IEs to the event buffer mwifiex_process_uap_event() handles EVENT_UAP_STA_ASSOC by exposing the (re)association request IEs that the firmware copies into the event: sinfo->assoc_req_ies = &event->data[len]; len = (u8 *)sinfo->assoc_req_ies - (u8 *)&event->frame_control; sinfo->assoc_req_ies_len = le16_to_cpu(event->len) - (u16)len; event->len is supplied by the device firmware and is never validated, and the subtraction is unchecked. assoc_req_ies points into adapter->event_body[MAX_EVENT_SIZE], a fixed-size array embedded in the kmalloc()'d struct mwifiex_adapter. On the ap_11n_enabled path mwifiex_set_sta_ht_cap() walks these IEs with cfg80211_find_ie(), whose for_each_element() loop dereferences each element header. A firmware-reported event->len larger than the bytes actually received makes assoc_req_ies_len describe IEs that extend past event_body, so the walk reads out of the adapter slab object, a slab-out-of-bounds read (KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in cfg80211_find_ie). An event->len smaller than the header instead makes the int subtraction negative, which wraps to a huge size_t when stored in assoc_req_ies_len. The same length is handed to cfg80211_new_sta(), so a more modest over-claim can also copy stale event_body bytes into the NL80211_CMD_NEW_STATION notification. A malicious or malfunctioning mwifiex device (USB/SDIO/PCIe) can deliver such an event while the interface is in AP/uAP mode. Validate event->len before use: reject a length that underflows the header or that would place the IEs outside the event_body[] buffer the event was copied into. event->len here is struct mwifiex_assoc_event.len, a payload field internal to this event, not the transport frame length, so it is validated in this handler rather than at the generic MWIFIEX_TYPE_EVENT receive path, which only sees the event cause and the transport frame length. The bound is against event_body[MAX_EVENT_SIZE] rather than the actually-received length because the transports store the event differently (USB and SDIO leave the 4-byte event header in event_skb, PCIe strips it via skb_pull), whereas event_body is the single fixed buffer all of them copy the event into. This is the event-path analogue of the receive-path bounds checks added in commit 119585281617 ("wifi: mwifiex: Fix OOB and integer underflow when rx packets").
CVE-2026-68278 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-10 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/dp/mst: fix buffer overflows in sideband chunk accumulation drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() has three related bugs when processing device-provided sideband reply data: 1. Zero-length curchunk_len underflow: msg_len is a 6-bit field taken directly from the DP sideband header. If a device sends msg_len=0, curchunk_len is set to zero. The condition (curchunk_idx >= curchunk_len) is immediately true, and curchunk_len-1 wraps to 255 (u8 underflow). drm_dp_msg_data_crc4() reads 255 bytes from chunk[48], then memcpy() writes 255 bytes into msg[], both far out of bounds. 2. chunk[48] overflow: curchunk_len can reach 63 (6-bit field). chunk[] is only 48 bytes. Multi-iteration payload assembly appends 16-byte blocks until curchunk_idx reaches curchunk_len, writing up to 15 bytes past the end of chunk[] into msg[]. 3. msg[256] overflow: each chunk contributes (curchunk_len-1) bytes to msg[]. No check ensures curlen + (curchunk_len-1) stays within msg[256], so the memcpy can spill into adjacent struct fields. All three are reachable from any DP MST device that can forge sideband reply messages on a physical connection.
CVE-2021-34513 1 Microsoft 8 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 5 more 2026-08-10 7.8 High
Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-34512 1 Microsoft 11 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 8 more 2026-08-10 7.8 High
Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2024-21420 1 Microsoft 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more 2026-08-10 8.8 High
Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-34510 1 Microsoft 9 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 6 more 2026-08-10 7.8 High
Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2024-21379 1 Microsoft 4 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel and 1 more 2026-08-10 7.8 High
Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2023-35372 1 Microsoft 6 365 Apps, Office, Office 2019 and 3 more 2026-08-10 7.8 High
Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2024-21372 1 Microsoft 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more 2026-08-10 8.8 High
Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2024-21350 1 Microsoft 23 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 20 more 2026-08-10 8.8 High
Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2023-35385 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 16 more 2026-08-10 9.8 Critical
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2023-35383 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 16 more 2026-08-10 7.5 High
Microsoft Message Queuing Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2023-36911 1 Microsoft 20 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 17 more 2026-08-10 9.8 Critical
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2023-36910 1 Microsoft 20 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 17 more 2026-08-10 9.8 Critical
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2023-36866 1 Microsoft 6 365 Apps, Office, Office 2019 and 3 more 2026-08-10 7.8 High
Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability