| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The web application is vulnerable to clickjacking attacks. The site can be embedded into another frame, allowing an attacker to trick a user into clicking on something different from what the user perceives. This could potentially reveal confidential information or allow others to take control of their computer while clicking on seemingly innocuous objects. |
| The HttpOnlyflag of the session cookie \"@@\" is set to false. Since this flag helps preventing access to cookies via client-side scripts, setting the flag to false can lead to a higher possibility of Cross-Side-Scripting attacks which target the stored cookies. |
| The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it susceptible to brute-force attacks. |
| Due to missing authorization of an API endpoint, unauthorized users can send HTTP GET
requests to gather sensitive information. An attacker could also send HTTP POST requests to modify
the log files’ root path as well as the TCP ports the service is running on, leading to a Denial of Service
attack. |
| Files in the source code contain login credentials for the admin user and the property configuration password, allowing an attacker to get full access to the application. |
| All communication with the REST API is unencrypted (HTTP), allowing an attacker to intercept traffic between an actor and the webserver. This leads to the possibility of information gathering and downloading media files. |
| A remote unauthorized attacker may gather sensitive information of the application, due to missing authorization of configuration settings of the product. |
| The web application is susceptible to cross-site-scripting attacks. An attacker who can create new dashboard widgets can inject malicious JavaScript code into the Transform Function which will be executed when the widget receives data from its data source. |
| For failed login attempts, the application returns different error messages depending on whether the login failed due to an incorrect password or a non-existing username. This allows an attacker to guess usernames until they find an existing one. |
| The application is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An endpoint can be used to send server internal requests to other ports. |
| The application sends user credentials as URL parameters instead of POST bodies, making it vulnerable to information gathering. |
| Linked URLs during the creation of iFrame widgets and dashboards are vulnerable to code execution. The URLs get embedded as iFrame widgets, making it possible to attack other users that access the dashboard by including malicious code. The attack is only possible if the attacker is authorized to create new dashboards or iFrame widgets. |
| Certain requests pass the authentication token in the URL as string query parameter, making it vulnerable to theft through server logs, proxy logs and Referer headers, which could allow an attacker to hijack the user's session and gain unauthorized access. |
| The application discloses all used components, versions and license information to unauthenticated actors, giving attackers the opportunity to target known security vulnerabilities of used components. |
| Certain error messages returned by the application expose internal system details that should not be visible to end users, providing attackers with valuable reconnaissance information (like file paths, database errors, or software versions) that can be used to map the application's internal structure and discover other, more critical vulnerabilities. |
| The credentials of the users stored in the system's local database can be used for the log in, making it possible for an attacker to gain unauthorized access. This could potentially affect the confidentiality of the application. |
| JavaScript can be ran inside the address bar via the dashboard "Open in new Tab" Button, making the application vulnerable to session hijacking. |
| Multiple endpoints with sensitive information do not require authentication, making the application susceptible to information gathering. |
| For failed login attempts, the application returns different error messages depending on whether the login failed due to an incorrect password or a non-existing username. This allows an attacker to guess usernames until they find an existing one. |
| The application does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame, making it possible for an attacker to guess user credentials. |
